Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/334/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/334/2007 Généré par l'IA

Contract Termination Deadline Compliance

Numéro de cause ATAS/334/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Frais judiciaires à la charge de l'autorité
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute concerned the validity of a contract termination notice issued after the deadline stipulated within the agreement's general terms and conditions. The court reasoned that the termination notice, delivered after the contractually defined time limit for such notifications had passed, was invalid because the stipulated time limit was a condition precedent for termination, and strict compliance with formal requirements regarding deadlines in contractual notices is mandatory unless expressly provided otherwise.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Contract Termination Deadline Compliance: The court reasoned that the termination notice, delivered after the contractually defined time limit for such notifications had passed, was invalid because the stipulated time limit was a condition precedent for termination, and strict compliance with formal requirements regarding deadlines in contractual notices is mandatory unless expressly provided otherwise.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
observation du délai résiliation de contrat notification des ententes exigences de forme conditions générales du contrat validité du contrat

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision governs the allocation of court costs, which was explicitly applied in the dispositive.
Généré par l'IA
A/2398/2006
Contractual Notice Requirements and Termination Validity
A/326/2005
Contract Termination Validity Based on Notice Requirements
A/498/2007
Contractual Notice Compliance and Ambiguous Deadline Interpretation
A/3032/2006
Contract Deadline as Condition Precedent Dispute
A/1841/2003
Contractual Termination Validity Dispute

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision governs the allocation of court costs, which was explicitly applied in the dispositive.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



                !"

##$!

 !# %& '%!%& $ #%'$ ' &$

'()     )  



 ! "



!" 

##     $ %&'( )*+ **,% "*5 *--*).%&!"/0/1%23224)/

        Christine BULLIARD et Bertrand REICH,    

   -363-  

  ! %  5&! "  &*4  !* 8  9*   +! %  :&*"*! !5 &   ! " "  *;! "*! < &  -*  *=8  9!  *" ) "   & "*%    , $;;* *"*5  &"5% > =* &* %     "*!  ?*" +!  > *, +! %  ,  ! "&"58

$*!)*"$"5 * "! %,*";**"*@'

 # '$ *! + &$ !# %& '%!%& $ #%'$ ' &$

 ,--.   /

0-.1.)) 2 ,3 4 5 &6

2' ! " > $##       $   ! $!  > 5*   &*!   !*" > $**"5 !"*;*5 >  ! " &  5**!  2A !)=  300.% !;* 5 &  5**!   !&&!*"*!  A +)*  3007%  ?*" +! >*,+! '

3' 9B!"",=!*'

/' !">!! ),*& 54'

A' *",& !5 "@ "*"'

C' &&*"*!9 "'C0 %*;! & "*,9&)";!   ! !" & 5" D"5*/0+! 4!"*;*"*!& &* !5 5 *=;55  %(?E*F ?!;,*.%.00A   %" !*:&* '5*&"D" & !!@5'5!* !*"G H**, :"",5**! ! "5* !="* *"& 5**!"",58=H:&! &! ,!"*;*"*&!)!*  "" " 5**!8H&! " *@" !! & 5""'(*5!*  !"*" &  " !* 55" 55 5 ! ""  H =H " H *-%  *=;55  &! &"  "*4   ! ,9* ) 5  * )='5!*  ! "*! ! !B  & )% ,*  !" +!*"% ** ,  5**! "",5 " 9)!&&  ,5"5:&5*5 ! "I "'2/3%20."20JH'  @ ;;* G  5*"G   *  ( =(

!&*!;! & 5" D""!"*;*5:& "*">$;;*& @ ;;



6/.063007