Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/33/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/33/2004 Généré par l'IA

Injunction Challenge Based on Adequacy of Legal Remedy

Numéro de cause ATAS/33/2004
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A dispute arose when a party challenged the imposition of a permanent injunction, arguing that the lower court erred by applying an incorrect standard for granting such relief, contending that irreparable harm was not shown and that monetary damages would suffice. The appellate court affirmed the injunction, reasoning that the lower court properly applied the standard for injunctive relief by finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and recognizing that the ongoing conduct constituted a continuing trespass and nuisance for which no adequate remedy at law existed, thereby justifying the imposition of a permanent injunction to prevent future harm.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Injunction Challenge Based on Adequacy of Legal Remedy: The appellate court affirmed the injunction, reasoning that the lower court properly applied the standard for injunctive relief by finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and recognizing that the ongoing conduct constituted a continuing trespass and nuisance for which no adequate remedy at law existed, thereby justifying the imposition of a permanent injunction to prevent future harm.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
règlement du conflit juridictionnel exceptions de procédure droit à un recours effectif contentieux commercial action en interdiction préjudice irréparable

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Applied to order the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
A/1472/2006
Injunction Against Statute Denied Due to Lack of Irreparable Harm
A/1679/2002
Denial of Injunction Upheld
A/1752/2004
Injunction Scope Review and Modification
A/2415/2024
Construction Injunction Appeal on Suspensive Effect of Neighbor's Appeal
A/3379/2006
Property Dispute and Trespass Damages

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied to order the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

     

    $%&'()%*))+,*,$- $.$%++%*))/

$0.

 . $1 $.$1  $$   $1

#  *& "2 *))/

*3  4 

  

# $5555555555

#



$  .6 11 $-  1$ 6$.   .   $   !"  #$ % &'

 

              ! "# # " ()*"

 6$ .

+,    +$ - (..( /! 00000000001 2!"3&  41  535  -    '!!, 6 7! 35   8-!   9! :!!3  '-     :;  '-       53 3  5<!',

(,  5!!  (* '! (..(    55 -!  =558! :  !-3  '!! !! 7:  -35-! 3 53 : - 3!'-  #>? 8,..  ($+ 8, .. -,  53 @ ! :A<   !  -!  ;!1  ! B "  /1 2!"3&  !41  !8!5  ' 5!!    1  $ C (..>1 !   !-3  '!!  $(# 8,.. 3 -!,    =5  (+ 5  D -!  !!   59   ((,

>, ! % :33!!    +E C (..>  !    5!!  33!!    +? 3-= (..>,  63!7  ! 3 71 ' :A<   ! ! 3  531   '!   !-3 5!1  3 5 3  =558!  -6!--   7! 3 F '5 %  3 ' :59   ((,

E,     +> = (..>   -35-  +. '-= (..>   63!7 '!  ?*   -!  5-= (..+1 -! '! !5 :6  !'!5 !', --  !!  55 3G   <!1 ! !& 7    ! ;:9! F 5   -3 5<-  5 5! % (..+,

*,  !  58& 6 -   5!!1 3 !  (+ = (..>,

 !=  5  -3! 3  3!1 7! :     +? 5-= (..>,

 !    63!75 8!   3 3!!3,  !& 7 :  3 31 : 31 3'!  !!   35!  '!1  : 31  3 ! -3  - !5      ,  !  3 '!  !   3!=!!5 :;    ,  33    "!1   7!  1  !  63!75 7 :5 (..+ '! =! 55 3!  -3 3    :59   1 -! 7  5  -3! 3 3    " >)*"

'  5-!1  33!!   !, 31  '  -   <!1  -    5! 7! 7:!  ! %  -6!--,

 8!  :!1    55 <5 % ;<,

  .

+,   !;5  -3 ! 3&   --!!     "   '= 2! *?  ?.  4,

(,    55 -! :88!  35 != 8-5- % :! >1 , >   !  +E '-= (..( -!8!  !  :<!! ;!!! 24,

>,  ! 855   3! <55  !   !  ?

= (... 2 4  5  '!<  + ;'! (..>,   &  33!=   H3&1  -F- 7  !  H '!!  '!'     + ;'! (..> 2!"3&   4,

E, 6 -   !  ! %    '!!  9-- 7!  ! ?*  5'   8-- 7!  ! ?E  5',  ! %   3 !  3-! ;  -! !' ! I  55 ! HA< 3! 2, (+   4,  ! %   3 3 ! F !!35 2,

E.   41 ! F ;5 2, >#   4,     3 7!  ! %   !!  '!! 5 9! ; H 5  -!   !7   3  '-   ,    85  5'7 H;- % -3 H -! 5-!5   5!,        '!! ;5  <-5   "' !   3!  95 2, ># , (   4,

' 35 %   !!  '!!   @ ! 67 !  3!=  3  -3  -!  5 !&  '1  =!8!! 3 A9 5!'  3 A9 H!,    ! -3&1 ! H5 -3  5 -3&  !!1 ! 3! H! -3  5 !-3&  !! 2, (#   4, " E)*"

      5-!5 3  5  !!1  ' 3' H !'!5 !' !! 7  =!8!! 3 A9 5!'  3 A9 H!   + ;'! 7! !   I H@ !   (.  5'   >+ 5-= 7! 35&  5!!  !7 5 2A<   !  5&4, !!1  !  7H   '!< %  ;  3- 3  ! -3  <! 3G   7  !!  55 '5  %  >+ 5-= 7! 35&  5!!  !7 5,  '9  3-   % 3'!    % HA<   !1  8G % !  !'!5 !'   <!  7  !!  '5 2  !-!  H, ? 7   7! 35'! 7H !! H 3G   3  <!  G%  +HE.. 8, 3 -!4   9 5!-    3 !-3 3!7 <-5  "' !   3!  95,

*,   H 3 38!5  H33!5 7 ! !  ! H;  !1 =! 7  7! ! ! 55 35 % H537   -,

!  != -3 =! H<-!    7 ! ! 9!= H<  3 -- ! 7! !  '!  %  HA<  ?* 1  ! H 3 9! 7  ' 3G "%  HA<   !   !5!      1  < 81  !  7H  3!  -3 H 3 3!=  < ,

?,  571    3 F 7 ;5,

JJJJJ " *)*"

$  . 6 1 . $1 $.$1  $$   $1

#

$  7 

+, 5   '=,

$# 7

(,  ;,

>, ! 7  35  <!,

E, 8-  3!   7H 3' 8-    35 F   5!  >. ; &  !8!! 3 3! --5 5  != 855  1 9K!L987! ?1 ?..E   1  ! 6-3!,  5!  3 F 3<5,  -5-! ! M 4 !!7 6- 7H 5!!   5! =!  !  3   5!! 75N =4 63 3 7 -!8 ! !- 3'! -   5!!N 4 3  !<     35, !  -5-!  ! 3  ! 55- 5-55   4 =4  4 !"1  != 855    3 3   -!&    7H! ' 5 !'=,  -5-!   -!   -@  3'1 7!  ;!1 !! 7  5!! 75  H'33  7   55 635!5   2, +>(1 +.?  +.$ 4,

 <88! M  5! M

!  = 

 35 F  !8!5 6 3! !! 7H% H88! 855   ! 3  <88