Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/325/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/325/2007 Généré par l'IA

Statutory Offset Calculation and Prior Year Liability Application

Numéro de cause ATAS/325/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute concerned the proper calculation of a statutory offset involving liabilities accrued in different years, specifically whether a particular prior year's liability could be used to offset a current year's liability when that prior year's liability had already been subject to the offset in a previous period. The court reasoned that the governing statute clearly limited the offset to liabilities incurred in the immediately preceding year, thereby precluding the use of an earlier year's liability that had already served to reduce a liability in the immediately preceding year, affirming the lower court's application of the statute as written.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Statutory Offset Calculation and Prior Year Liability Application: The court reasoned that the governing statute clearly limited the offset to liabilities incurred in the immediately preceding year, thereby precluding the use of an earlier year's liability that had already served to reduce a liability in the immediately preceding year, affirming the lower court's application of the statute as written.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
limites légales usage antérieur responsabilité limitée décision préjudicielle sur l'assujettissement fiscal droit de préemption légal mise en compte des cotisations

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal procedure.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



                !!""# !$!""#



%& '& ( % &( (

()*+  ,  !, *  !"", 



 !"#$! %  & '

'

() ))    %   ))  ! '#$ *" +,!  -

               

   %0.,%  

  3'  "$  44' " 4 () ))         ) 5%46 7  8 " 9 "$#: 0119! $#' ;    5%46 7 <$8  4# # " ,22 3= 01 4  # "<*;>0119?"3"##'@

"<$"0A>*0112;<'"''"$!*'? *"<%#"<*'4''$"':"@

  "$ " 9 # 0112 "   '  "$  44' " 9 "$#:0119''?!*:"$''3'B$"6+>*0119 ;<$!4#*%#0119*'$'$3'$@

"#C#>"?"*'C'B$" D!#4''"<'""$''?$=

''""'?<'=E,=,"3$"$4'F$$""' ""9':0111>?<;<*"4$*;<''$" !<4'"$"$"$44'' ?$'$3#$@

''<46!<'#$B'$"$44''F "9"$#:0119@

<*'"<4"'!"''?':>''"B "D@



.,/0.0112  %,.,%  

 ( -  '& ( % &( (



./010 ** 2  300  0   4 5 6,! 7

  10 *

+= "'"<'4() ))        )" "$44'"9"$#:0119@

0= ''?':>'@

,= B"D=  F336  $"'   B) $ 

43#"4$'C'''3$G4'?H;H333$"$ "'$4:?4F33



.,/0.0112