Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/322/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/322/2006 Généré par l'IA

Asset Transfer Avoidance in Insolvency

Numéro de cause ATAS/322/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The matter concerned whether certain transfers of assets made by an entity to other related parties within a year of insolvency constituted avoidable preferential transfers under the relevant insolvency statute. The court reasoned that the demanding party failed to establish that the recipients were in a position to receive a benefit that they would not have otherwise received in the ordinary course of business or that the transfers created a deficiency that prejudiced other creditors, as the statutory presumption of invalidity for transfers within the specified period was rebutted by evidence showing the transfers were made in good faith and in the ordinary course of financial affairs.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, Art. 68 al. 2 LTF; Asset Transfer Avoidance in Insolvency: The court reasoned that the demanding party failed to establish that the recipients were in a position to receive a benefit that they would not have otherwise received in the ordinary course of business or that the transfers created a deficiency that prejudiced other creditors, as the statutory presumption of invalidity for transfers within the specified period was rebutted by evidence showing the transfers were made in good faith and in the ordinary course of financial affairs.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
transfert de patrimoine insolvabilité prestation statutaire bonne foi atteinte astucieuse aux intérêts pécuniaires droit bancaire

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision was cited in the final order regarding the allocation of court costs.

Art. 68 al. 2 LTF

This provision was cited in the final order regarding the taxation of costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

                !" #$$%  ###$$&



' (') )*)  ') *(

+ ,  $  #$$& 



 !"""#$!  % &!&'    

!'&

(( (((    (  ) !* "'"# +&,- .!'/,00 ,1,,   1-



                 

   *1$/*  

-' ) .(

.&#""!1/4"1003 ""!.'"!5"*.&6"7 # %    &'"''"! 8 !''  ,,8090:&; !&&.!' %  &'  )) <" " )"' #'# )&# % '!&'  ,&  &  /, #=&100>?

8!..!"'"!:!&#.&8"'#&#124"'1003?

#""!&!..!"'"!,/.'=&1003?

&!&"'&4'#,2!'!=&1003'!.#'#.&!&&"&1,:#)&"&100@?

&#.!",>&100@?

 8"  !.&'"! .&!  1/ & 100@  !&  <  &!&'#&#&'"&&!&!&?



)' ) *(

!"A)!"&B!&A"'"!4"""&57#'#!":"#'"'"'# 6 ,&!C'100/  &"='!&!" !.!#34A !' .&#"'')"*.&#"' 3..#'',@4A&5&';,';&'3@  7;

"'%B'"!B#'"!,@4A& .& &"=:##& 124)"&100>5 D,/0,0@7 & !"A)!"!.'# ,/:#)&"&  ".!"'"!'&"'!"&&A'.&''' &"='!&!"  "#A&  & % '&!" 4A '"'"&     B'''  B#'"!  !)E4A&;

!.#'.!&4A&B.6'""#'=";

 ! 8&'; -9 ; ,   !" '!  ,1 .'=& ,9-3 &  .&!#& ""'&'")5 ? 3,07 &'&"'&!&':"%.&!#&?

8"!)"'6!&8.&&''&F&&G?



$/2,/$1003  */$/*  

  *(.  (') )*)  ') *(



/0121   3  411 1  56 "&# *7

,; &'&'&"'&!&;

1; F&G;

/; "'<.&!#&'A&'"';     A&::"6&  .&#"'         "DD H&"( H



!."!:!&.&#'&&I''!'":"#E.&'"A&::





$/2,/$1003