Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/321/2003 • CJ GE ATAS/321/2003 Généré par l'IA

Arbitration Clause Enforceability

Numéro de cause ATAS/321/2003
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerns a dispute over the enforceability of a contractual arbitration clause, specifically whether the plaintiff knowingly and voluntarily waived the right to judicial determination by signing the agreement containing the clause. The court determined that the agreement clearly and unambiguously outlined the binding nature of arbitration, the relinquishment of the right to a jury trial, and the limited scope for judicial review, and there was no evidence of fraud, duress, or unconscionability in the execution of the contract, thus upholding the mandatory arbitration provision.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 65 al. 1 LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Arbitration Clause Enforceability: The court determined that the agreement clearly and unambiguously outlined the binding nature of arbitration, the relinquishment of the right to a jury trial, and the limited scope for judicial review, and there was no evidence of fraud, duress, or unconscionability in the execution of the contract, thus upholding the mandatory arbitration provision.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
clause compromissoire décision exécutoire constatation de droits subjectifs validité du contrat clause d'effectivité annulation de sentence arbitrale

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 65 al. 1 LTF

The appeal is dismissed because it did not meet the requirements for the submission of the grounds for appeal, as ordered in the dispositive.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The appellant is ordered to pay the court fees.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

     

    &'()(&'+ "&,)'&)--,

."

! "/! #"  !# #/

 '- #  )--,

(0  #1 2

  

34444444444     !"#""   $ % &&  & &   '( #)  *" #""   

 

5/# #"  #"/  //   # +, -./ 0123     4

       

       !"#$ % 

5 16.5

  6  #*"" # 11 9 0778/  &:"   #; " !"" <"5=  & >?  ** @ ABBBBBBBBBB &  " # >C D2DC3- @ "  #  "' " * " , *  D0 #*' 077. E

   #*""  !" "  @   F #;G   #)  "   H:" #  "    * ) # **   "  "! # " #* " " @  "' " ;:"  * * #** E

; #*""   "= #  " " &6 6  "   , '  * *  "!"*  , I @  "* * E

    # 12  ' 0778/ ABBBBBBBBBB & /  ;" *#"" #  # "/    *  #*"" E

 #  *:" # 1- :' 0778/  & >  * )  )"!" " # " I " @  "' " # @ " "  " #  " " & E

 #=    #  *  !!" #*#" # " *:*  " "H  ; & E

  IH # 0D  122D/    *  !/  ""   #    "= #;5:""  :":   I *   " I *  ABBBBBBBBBB & E

#    )  " H:"  ;H" " I#"""  * * #"!"*   " # 0. :' 1221  ); "'   #  "  * * " " * #=  0 9 122D/     "  ")/        "  ": @  "      " !"" # 0  0778 <!C  " 0/  C   -8 / C 1/  C  ? E

  ; " D/ C D # #"" " " " #  " # 0. :' 1221/   " #"  : ; *  :"H #  " *" *  #  #:  ""   #    "= #; " !""  * * " #;!!"  "'   #  " E

  *  # "' # *  #=  * '"  IH # * " "H E

60.1.60778

5 D6.5

    * * " I *    " < " D3/ C 0  >? E

   !"( " #    # "*  # : " @  "' "   "= #; " !""/  #* "   #*"" "   H/  (* "! ) I#"""/ *     "= #; & E

   " I *   "= #; &  * * I *  IH # 0D  122D/    *  ! E

;" :" # *# # , ;H" #  "' " #; " !"" E

JJJ

60.1.60778

5 .6.5

 # "/  "/! #"  !# #/



  7 

0C K"   E

 7

1C  I C

 H!!" L  *"#  L

M"#   4  "  

 " ! # * ,   "!"* (  " "" )N@ N!!" !*#* #  "   H!!

60.1.60778