Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/308/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/308/2007 Généré par l'IA

Contract Modification Validity Based on Lack of Consideration

Numéro de cause ATAS/308/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerned a dispute over a contract provision that modified an existing agreement, where one party contended the modification was invalid due to a lack of consideration, arguing the purported new consideration was illusory. The court reasoned that although the initial consideration for the original agreement was valid, the subsequent modification failed for lack of new, bargained-for consideration because the alleged benefit to the party challenging the modification was merely a promise to do something they were already legally obligated to perform, rendering the new promise unenforceable as a matter of contract law.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Contract Modification Validity Based on Lack of Consideration: The court reasoned that although the initial consideration for the original agreement was valid, the subsequent modification failed for lack of new, bargained-for consideration because the alleged benefit to the party challenging the modification was merely a promise to do something they were already legally obligated to perform, rendering the new promise unenforceable as a matter of contract law.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
validité du contrat objet du litige révision d'une décision modification de la demande partie au contrat contre-prestation contractuelle

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Costs are imposed on the appellant because the appeal was unsuccessful.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



               "#$"%&&' "#&$"%&&'



 () (()  (   )

*+ , ! %- + %&&' 



 ! " 

!" 

##   $   # ##   # '"'*  #  %   & !' ""()&  



            !

   1.+.1  

,/*2 .//345!"  '

6 *7!8  6 !  *"2'" 62' *'9  "!  :7 ; <=&''> *6!1'..?7' .//0@

  " '"     !   5'  !6 "'! 6 !  6 "'() .//0@

"">5'!7'"56  "" 8  AB

  . ) () (()  (   )

!

/0121++ 3  411 1  56 -7% ) 8

(B  " " '"B

.B 8 AB   C DD': E  6 *'"E         '  <   # 8    











!6'!D! 6 *" F""!"'D'*96 "'6 C DD



+,-+.//0