Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/305/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/305/2005 Généré par l'IA

Statutory Funding Obligation and Unconstitutional Taking

Numéro de cause ATAS/305/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute involved a claim that a governmental entity failed to provide necessary funding as required by a statute, leading to financial detriment for the claimant, who alleged the government's action constituted an unconstitutional taking and a violation of due process. The court reasoned that the statute imposed a mandatory obligation on the entity to provide the funding, and the entity's subsequent administrative decision to withhold those funds was contrary to the clear statutory language, thus constituting an arbitrary and capricious action that bypassed required procedures and directly harmed the claimant's established property interest.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Statutory Funding Obligation and Unconstitutional Taking: The court reasoned that the statute imposed a mandatory obligation on the entity to provide the funding, and the entity's subsequent administrative decision to withhold those funds was contrary to the clear statutory language, thus constituting an arbitrary and capricious action that bypassed required procedures and directly harmed the claimant's established property interest.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
détournement de fonds violation du mandat exception d'inconstitutionnalité litige en matière de contributions publiques obligation de paiement inobservation du délai légal

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

     

   

"#$%&"#''( ")'$"#''$



* +!* ,  * ,+

%- ./ 0  %# 1 #''$

  

 2222222222 



** *    ! ! " # $ %&  '(

           !   / *). /

  3 4 $  0000000000  '  #  $   11  1 2 /34    '! 5 ! 6  7 #  83    ! +*  *- '  +  +* 7  *--. #  2 '5 3  '  !

9 *:,,*:---;--   <:=+< 6; ,- >

 3 !(   ! ? 3'@ *--.    '!   6(  3   8% !  83    >

 3 !(    33   ! *= @ *--.   6 '(  !(   ! 6 >

 A ((  B(   , !('@ *--.  !  !(   >

 3   ! +. ' *--"    '!   6'(   @ ! ( CA    !(   ! ? 3'@  *= @ *--.  ' 6 C ! 7 %  '3('  (  #  (  !   % (    >

A  3( ( C C  7D  %' C     3    3 # 7 >

A 7 ( #  !('  A ((  ! '     E  C B A 3 (( '@( 6'(' # '  !A 7 $  F 2  ! *= ' *--"5 >

   4   %7   A%   B!    25  (( '! 6 (    ( !4  + G *--H   @  !    '3( ! " B% !  3( !   7 /3( ! " 33(  +< B%  2; + ;   "< 5 >

   # A  ! A(  ! +< B%  3   @ 6(!(  *? B7  *--. 2 9 +H-  +-<5  !   %7   !3(  +H 6(7   ! 3      % 3'   @  !    !  (%   #   B%     ! A ! A(  ! 7D B%  >

 6'(' # :; "<  ; + ;  8; .    @  !    I    C !   3(7 # A  "<  C   7 #   6(!(  A/'!  ! +, ' +==. 2 $5 >

  '3( 3 B% !  !A34    (@  >

)*"+,)*--.

/ H). /

    '!   (  !(     %  6'(' # A; "H ; H  >

    !4  !7  @B >

  7 !(   C !    '!  3 J   (8( ( 3 A (( >

)*"+,)*--.

/ .). /

  ,+5  +!* ,  * ,+



6.3   7  8   9: %;# ,<

+;  C    !7  @B;

*; &   ! K;

 %66 4  ( ! M

$ /   L   N   

 3  6' ! 3( J   6 ( D 3  

)*"+,)*--.