Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/30/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/30/2007 Généré par l'IA

Taxpayer v. Assessing Authority: Property Assessment Methodology Dispute

Numéro de cause ATAS/30/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case involves a dispute over the interpretation and application of statutory provisions regarding property assessments and associated penalties, specifically challenging the calculation methodology used by the assessing authority which resulted in significant tax liabilities and interest charges against the taxpayer. The court reasoned that the methodology employed by the authority—which included certain retrospective applications or interpretations of the relevant statute regarding valuation dates and adjustment factors—was inconsistent with the plain language of the law and prior judicial precedent, thus concluding that the assessment and resulting penalties levied were improperly calculated and affirming the lower court's finding that the assessment methodology was erroneous.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Taxpayer v. Assessing Authority: Property Assessment Methodology Dispute: The court reasoned that the methodology employed by the authority—which included certain retrospective applications or interpretations of the relevant statute regarding valuation dates and adjustment factors—was inconsistent with the plain language of the law and prior judicial precedent, thus concluding that the assessment and resulting penalties levied were improperly calculated and affirming the lower court's finding that the assessment methodology was erroneous.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
estimation fiscale immobilière autorité judiciaire fiscale assujettissement du contribuable administration fiscale date déterminante d'évaluation fixation de l'amende

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Imposes the costs of the federal procedure on the appellant.
Généré par l'IA
A/998/2005
Tax Assessment Valuation Methodology Challenge
A/2845/2007
Statutory Interpretation of Assessment Calculation Methodology
A/1397/2004
Tax Assessment Valuation Method Challenge
A/3121/2006
Statutory Tax Calculation Methodology Dispute
A/2367/2007
Property Tax Valuation Method Dispute

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Imposes the costs of the federal procedure on the appellant.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



               "#$%&"'((& )"#("'(($

)

 ) * *)*  *  

+,  '

 -& . '(($ 

 !"#$%&'( )*+!#,)- "#" $)""#.$)""/)0

"# !"#$!%&1&   



)

2         3  ! "$>" "#$,4, 334    33 5 6   738332 95$$:: ;1!<1&&0 6

2    33  .33 ! *")): 3=!")):3=%%!%&%%   



             !

  &?;  

* / )

%4 A*#)"&;#&11(!%(B#C#D" D",#B) ,$  "- " "#  ! $  %E;(! )   !$%E;&!#$")"&%F)%E@'4

&4 3C>>&"A*#),$)$! D",#B)"$  ,)* , #)$ " - " ,$-+ ,> G ,  "#" ")  #*! )##) "$,$ ,B "  2        3 3  4

'4  A*#) " "- ) "- "$>)>  '1 A &11( )  $)$ )# ".>> D"$%E)D&11(,=$)",)*4

;4  D " $  )$ " "#"  # "  ))) " ,$-+  ") " '1 )D &11(! )  ),$  2           3  &@)D&11(,) "  ##G  #)) "  -  G ")  #*! ) )&%F)%E@')'1A&11(4

H4 3   "  2             3  "<-#D&11(!,))G,")#* ,"#")"%E1.%&;>4,))>>)",%E<H4

(4 3   " /)  0! " &@ -#D &11(!  "#"=$,>".C))"$,")AG.%E<H4

@4  "#) ) $)$ )# = ,)  ") " ; "$#D &11(4  A")"G$G.I"$>)".D-)".%;"$#D&11(! J))"D".-"-,$)$4,!"$%1 A-&11@$)$"$I"#","G D"$ "$"#,)"D,*4

<4 .D".DA)""$>=$!$)$*"$IA*4

*  )

%4 .)4&H">$"$D,*",$-+,>! -!--))-")$"%@"$#D%EE'729!)$-* %A-&111!B*,$"""-4GA)) ,"K",))")I,)*7)4%&&)%&' " -: 9! A*"""-#,$))".)4@'4%">$"$

    ?'@<(?&11( '?;  

,$-+ ,> " &H A %E<& 79! ) I B-  D )"",%F)&11'!")!,BG.>>  $)$)#7)4%;& 9!=$)".>>,)*D" $" $,))"$)#$,A*""-4

&4 3.)4&&27-)-*",%A-&1119! " "-!  ,)) " ) G ")  #* ) ,)*$ >#$#) =)4%&&!%&'!%;%)%;& 5)4'IH 2.,,G) ,*#))I)>$74%94CGA)!,))" )I,)*,"I">>$),))")!*#)$ " - " D ,* =)) $-)#)  ##) " "-! )  ,))")!*#)$"-"D,*=))$-)#) ##)""#*7>4)4&;294!A) I  ,)) " ) ) I .- " D ,* =))  ##) "   " #*  )$J) "  ##) " "- 7 2 %&<  &'15 2%&E;;;94

 K,B!  A* " ,#B )  "$  ,)* , #)$ " ,)) " ) G ")  #* ,  "#"4  ") ,)) )! "K ,)!  " #*!  &% F) %E@'! "K) ,)  '1 A&11(!")IGA*#)""-)"-=$)4

'4 3  "#) ,")!  ,)) G ,")  #* ,  "#")"%E1.%&;>4 !"#"")I=:$,#)) "EH.1(&>47%E1.%&;>4L&94

;4 >#$#) I  A,"! ",  A "$)#) ,  ,)* AG.##)")>)",))")""#!A) "-$D$$>")),))")I")$J)#,) #))":4 )$J))$)=###$*.)4%& ".",$-+,>-!--))-")$ " %< - %E<; 7 &9    )= $*#)!  : ) ,$

7 2,D$'(?1&"%<A)&11'94

H4  $##)   ,M!  ,$" $)) *)) 7)4 @' 4 &  ) <E64%",$""#))-"%&,)#D%E<H94



NNN



    ?'@<(?&11( ;?;  

  ) /  ) * *)*  *  



01232,, 4   52 2  2  6! -&' 7

%4 -)  2             3   I )>$! " #,) "   !  ## " EH.1(& >4 I  2       33   .3 3 ! * " )):3=! #,) #$ 6 <% 11 &' 1&'1 %1%% << @1 1  >- " "#  :3 !  G " )$J) #,)   " "$)!"B'1A&11(AG.##)")>)4

&4 K+"#))G"D4

'4 )G,$")*))4

;4 >#  ,) "  G. ,-) >#  )  ,$) J) "  "$ " '1 A "B  )>) , , ##"$ "$  D >$"$ " ! 3COPC>G (! (11;   !  ) =#,4  "$  ,) J) ,*$4  #$# ") L 9 "G =)#) G "$  ) "$ D)   ) , "  "$))G$5D9=,,G#)>)#,-"#")) )"$59,)*)",$))43#$#  )) ,  ) $$#) $#$$  )) 9 D9 ) 9 :"!  D>$"$",,)#)BG. "-"$-D4#$#"#)#+ " ,-! G ) A)!  G  "$ ))G$ ) .-,, " G$)$=,$"$)7)4%'&!%1()%1<94  *>>B  $")L             QR 0 D3 

,>#",$)J)))>$=,)GKIK>>>$"$ ",*>>

    ?'@<(?&11(