ATAS/299/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/299/2006 Généré par l'IA

Contract Interpretation and Breach Affirmation

Numéro de cause ATAS/299/2006

Autorité / Tribunal Cour de Justice (Cour civile) · Chambre des assurances sociales

Juridiction

Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)

Date de la décision 2006-03-22

Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)

Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A dispute arose concerning the validity of various agreements and whether certain actions constituted a breach, primarily revolving around the interpretation and enforcement of contract terms, including provisions related to payment, performance obligations, and the scope of a release. The court reasoned that the challenged actions were consistent with the express language and clear intent of the operative agreements, finding that the evidence supported the interpretation advanced by one party, and thus rejected the claims of breach and invalidity, leading to a judgment affirming the agreements' terms and the related conduct.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, Art. 64 LTF; Contract Interpretation and Breach Affirmation: The court reasoned that the challenged actions were consistent with the express language and clear intent of the operative agreements, finding that the evidence supported the interpretation advanced by one party, and thus rejected the claims of breach and invalidity, leading to a judgment affirming the agreements' terms and the related conduct.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA

interprétation du contrat notion de décision validité de clause compromissoire exécution action en paiement vérification par le pouvoir adjudicateur

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied for the allocation of court costs.

Art. 64 LTF

Applied for the granting of legal aid.

Généré par l'IA

A/4301/2006

Contract Validity and Breach Dispute

A/736/2002

Contract Breach Interpretation and Liability Affirmation

A/4464/2006

Contractual Dispute and Breach of Duty Affirmation

A/185/2004

Contract Interpretation and Breach of Agreement

A/3770/2005

Breach of Contract Dispute Affirmation

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied for the allocation of court costs.

Art. 64 LTF

Applied for the granting of legal aid.

Texte complet

#$%%%#&''( )#&#&''+

"")

)" , ) " , ,

,- .

&& &''+

! "#$%&# '()*+, -./0, ''12 #/## ##

*/3%* #& "' 12(' -2'' !"5 62-7' 727' 88''2 -9 ( ' '-8' ) ( !2(2' ( -' 1( * ! " :'*-9 '; - '<'2'(2-(&

/& ((/0='/$$4 ''8'2>?2(2''('' - )3 3 ! *1'2 - -2'( ( # =<'4#(21@/$$4 ?2<>A/B0/#8&/$ 8'(1'''81-'& (2'' -''>11''(?!/$$4(4='/$$. '' --C((#$B$#A8&%$8<('&

4& (2''(4#D/$$. '212>?2-'1(4/48& %$>'(?'2E1' 21(+?0A,8&/$ -2 ('8821-<2(''88'<1(&

A& ?2 812 --'' , -1@ /$$. '(2 F '2E 1' 2F ( ( ( ' > ( (2''& 'F'''<'212(>-G((?2 /$$A ''-?F'(''=F?#=<'-98'( ?2F''?2(''&

.& #/@/$$. '=2?--''(?2 1'8F?'<' <2 ( 1- ( /%B,%% 8& /$ /$$4 F ( '' ?2<'>4%B%#A8&A$&(('''2-</+D/$$. ' 2 '2E 1' ( # =<' /+ D /$$.& - ' --' > ?2 F?' <' 22 '812 - '' (9 8' /$$$(2'2(?'81(<''@'(<&

%& ?2 '=2((/<1@/$$.& (<'-G ( '2E 1' 8' <' F ( ( ?(1''' 8' > 8'(12'(<'E718<&

0& 2- ( #. (21@ /$$. ' 1' 1 ( (2''--''&

,& '(+=<'/$$% -'2(' < F?' ?2' --2 /$$A -'1 (?'2E 1' - 1E1 ' <9 -'F'<'2(2''&

+& )F' 227(2>=7&

34,,,3/$$. *43%* #& '7<'?7''=(''':;221('8'2''2 (9 #D/$$4 '@(' 1-2(.=7 (-2'(<'*-2'( .--2#%=7:&#& .% ;&

)'>?'(?2'(#%=7 - '@82(2 /0=<'/$$A: !#4$#$%; ( '7<'(-2 #482<' ('-''''7-1 '@( ' ( '27 > ' =7 '' ( ? ( ?2'(<H=7&

/& 8121>B&.%&#&6&# '@( 'C''F('-2<>?'.%(' 82(2 -' 722 ( (' ( ' ( % @ /$$$ : ;F''<>'82(2?*<''<'<( /$(21@#+A%: );&

)1-2-=7((?-9''2@'&

4& 2 <'7 # =<' /$$4 C 1('8'' ( 1@ ('-'' ( (1' ( '& --'@(B-9&

=2 ( 81 (2' 27H <@ :& .% %$ ;&

A& ) B& /% & # 2 ( '' 26 1' > --'(B'2E1'&

B&#A&/ )('-F''-I<-<( BH'(B'<'2'(2-( ''(2BHI '<'2'<(2(B1-GB-(-G( '' (21'2 <2 -2'('F1& ' 82(2 8'H -2'(((''&

-2( - 8'H' (21'' ( '' 8'7 H & // ( 971 B*<'' <'< ( 4# @ #+A0 : ); ( < <'7 (9 # =<' /$$#& '' '' 8'H2 - 6F 2 ( ''& B2 ( '' -(>B2'<':8&&//&# );&(B2('' - ( -G ( '' ('< < -2'('F1 ( 1- ( ''& ('< 8' H ' ( 1-' '71 2' > 8'H' ( '' 1 (1( ( -'9 ='8''< '7 F < ('889 '@1(<-@@:8&&/A&#A );&

34,,,3/$$. *A3%* 2@'<(21' '28'8( H'-28(B'1-J82(2('&'(1-' '2-(2('28':8&&/4&#4 );& ' ( 1-' 8'H '' ( - B2 ( '' ((2''(''2@'(''( 1-<2:&/.&# );&

8121>B&A#@'&#&8 ) ('<-G('2E1' - HI '<'2 '< '(2-( - '<'2 '< '2 ( B1-G B - ( -G ( '' '' > -G @ ( (21- F 1- <2 2' '82' (B 1' /. K H '' 88'<1 (F''B-22<2=FB#=<'-98'( B2'<'F''B2('' (9#=<'-98'(B2 '<'F''B2(''&

'2E 1' ( H B29< > . K - 2 ( ' F '' '271 -G2 F (21- 2@' @(81-<'>'(1-' >(28 >(( 8':&A#@'&/A/&/ );&''2-2-G2 FB -<' > ' ( 1-' :8& & A/ & # )L ) /$$4-&#A4;&

.& B-9 -G2(1-(''-B2/$$4( /%B,%%8&/$ F''21(-2B29<> 4%B%#A8&%$&9F1-<22''82'(B1'/.K H '' 88'<1 ( B > = ' F ' 2 ( '2E1' 8121H('-''27 (#=<'/$$. /+D/$$. (>F-'1'-<&

'1-F('(D > <F'2 8' 11'F2 '81' > B''12& 88 (B - <' -'@''2 ( '7 > B''12 /$$A 71' '@(</$$4&B- '2E1'('2E 1-'& 88('2> 1-@228'F (2@' 2'-G('<1''<-2=('@'-2'& @ ( 1- 8' F (2@' @' ( '2E ' ( -'1 ('8822 <7 ( -2'21 -'<2 2'& '2E 1'(1E1'(?'1-@'>8('( 1-' ' > 8 ( ?2 :6'88 #$$# ( '' '2E1'212'* "L #++/-&#00M!#++0-&4/4;& '(2@(('2E1'*''(2-((1'8- F''?-22-G2>1-&

34,,,3/$$. *.3%* "8(2 ('E=2&

NNNN

" , )/ )" , ) " , ,

012 3 4 56 7+& 8

#& 2<@&

/& =&

4& 'F-2(7'&

A& 81 -' ( F? -< 81 -2 E ( (2' ( 4$ = (9 '8'' - -' 11(2 (2 '@ 82(2 ( )6O'P68F' % %$$A ' H1-'& (2' - E -72& 121' ('Q ; '('F H1F(2''(2'@''-((2'' F2L @; H- - F 1'8 ' '1 -<' (1( (2''L ; - '7 ( -2& )' 121' ' - ' 221 2122 ; @; ; '*( '@82(2(--1'9F?' (<(2'<@&121'(1'1G

34,,,3/$$. *%3%* ( -< F' =' '' F (2'' F2 ?<-- ( F22H-2('2:&#4/ #$%#$,;& 788' -2'( R'( " '

-'81(-2E'8'2H-'''F?>?88'82(2 ('-788

34,,,3/$$.

Contract Interpretation and Breach Affirmation

Synthèse Legislator

Regeste Legislator

Mots-clés

Dispositions légales citées

Décisions connexes

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Texte complet