Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/298/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/298/2006 Généré par l'IA

Challenge to Fees and Duties Legislation of 1660-1664

Numéro de cause ATAS/298/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

This case concerns challenges to legislation from various years, primarily those enacted in 1660, 1661, 1663, and 1664, which allegedly related to fees, taxes, or duties. The court reasoned that since the relevant statute books from 1661, 1663, and 1664 were not presented as authenticated evidence, the challengers could not prove the continued existence or validity of the challenged provisions from those years, thus upholding prior rulings concerning the 1663 statute. Furthermore, the court found that the challenges to the 1660 legislation were insufficient as the challenger failed to present evidence demonstrating how the application of those older statutes actually harmed them or invalidated the current proceedings, concluding that without proper evidentiary presentation, the challenges could not succeed.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Challenge to Fees and Duties Legislation of 1660-1664: The court reasoned that since the relevant statute books from 1661, 1663, and 1664 were not presented as authenticated evidence, the challengers could not prove the continued existence or validity of the challenged provisions from those years, thus upholding prior rulings concerning the 1663 statute. Furthermore, the court found that the challenges to the 1660 legislation were insufficient as the challenger failed to present evidence demonstrating how the application of those older statutes actually harmed them or invalidated the current proceedings, concluding that without proper evidentiary presentation, the challenges could not succeed.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
procédures connexes mise à la charge des émoluments actes attaquables droits d'accise litige en matière de contributions publiques matière civile et commerciale

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

     

    $%&'&$(''% $()*$(''+ !!,

- !.-   -!  

/ 0 1 # (1  (''+

  

  ! " "#$ #  %   %   & $' '(  )$ '" $

$

     & ++  ,  !  ' - ./!  #$ 012! 3133    34 $")

                ! "# , 150,

-  2

 '"' ' #$$ ')#)  0 7"8 3999 #: ' ;<< $ ' ;,7'$) = > #   ?

 ') ' / 7"8 1663 # ( &   <) &$ ' " #< ?

  $@$) #: '  "" $ '   "$: '; +,   '$ ' 36 ')"8 1663 # &) ?

 ') ' ;  ' 10 @7 1661! $ A &)  $ ' "# $ ' $ "#)"$ # @$ $ # <$ ' 3 @7 1666  46 #$"8 1663! #  '",$ ' "# $ ' $ "#)"$ '#$) ?

  $@$) #: '  "" $ '   "$: '; +,   13 <)7 1663 # ;) $  ') ?

 #)7 ' ;  ' 39 7 1661! ##$  @$ '  ?

 ') ' ;  ' 31 7"8 1661! # (  '  "'<)  "$$ ' $ $ '",$ ' "# $$  "$$  $B '&7'$) #))'$ ?

  $@$)  39 ')"8 1661 # &) #: '  "" $ '   "$: '; +,  $  ') ?

 #)7 ' ;  ' 10 @7 1664 "$$  $" '  #)7 ' 39 7 1661 ?

 $" '    8 $ '    3 C$ 1664 ?

  ' / " $ 30 @ 1660 # (  8 $ '    <")  $ (& 7D$ ' #)' A  <"$  #@ $   <B)  ')  39 "! #  11 @ 1660! #  ')$" ?

 @D"$ ' 11 @$ 1660! # (  8 $ '  ! #: 7 @$  !  @$)  ! <")  ') ' &  ' / 7"8 1663! )  ') ' &  ' 10 @7 1661! $$) ( 

5326251663 , 450,

'D) '&7'$) ' ;) ;)7$ A 04!2E $ 7-)   A &  # 7 ') '   ' ')$ ?

  ' '$ '"$$< $@$) # ;) #: ' 8 <)') '  ?

;F$ # (  '!  '$ ' 34 <)7 166.!  '"  ! )  @D"$ ' 8 $ '   ' 11 @$ 1660 $ 7-)   A , # (; #:' <")"$ B ')$ ?

  ' / " 166. # (  8 ' )  ') B#)"$  #8$) A ;) ' $   ?

 )# ' ;) ' 32 " 166.! # ( ,  <")  8 ' ) (; $$   ?

!  !

; 7$ ' ;$G H9 G 3 '   $ ' 31 #$"8 39H2   #)' '"$$7!  $$ '  "$ < A  #)' ?

; 7$ '; #' $ $ ' -   ' IG

5326251663 , 050,

!  2  !.-   -!  

#

345   6  7   89 %+( :;

3G ' $ ' $$ ' G

1G -   ' IG

4G $ (  #)' $ D$$G

 D<<: J  )'$ J

  K + K

 # <" ' #)$ F$ $ $<) B #$  (;A ;<< <)') '   #  D<< 

5326251663