Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/294/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/294/2007 Généré par l'IA

Contract Breach Damages for Construction Defects

Numéro de cause ATAS/294/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court addressed whether a party was entitled to recover damages for breach of contract due to the other party's failure to timely complete construction work, specifically concerning defects in foundation work and subsequent repairs. The court reasoned that the trial court was justified in finding that the non-performing party breached the contract by failing to correct documented deficiencies within the required timeframe, thereby entitling the injured party to damages based on the reasonable cost of securing the necessary corrective work from another contractor, which was supported by expert testimony regarding the scope and cost of remediation.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Contract Breach Damages for Construction Defects: The court reasoned that the trial court was justified in finding that the non-performing party breached the contract by failing to correct documented deficiencies within the required timeframe, thereby entitling the injured party to damages based on the reasonable cost of securing the necessary corrective work from another contractor, which was supported by expert testimony regarding the scope and cost of remediation.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
défauts de construction frais de réparation partie au contrat coût de la construction violation essentielle du contrat versement de dommages-intérêts

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



                 !"



# $%# & '  #& '&$

&()*  + , + )  "         !"""#$    %!%&     !&%  

''  ( ''   '  (    "&"#   '   ' '  ')(   *+,-*. "% '&$/0$    

    

   $512$  

,  - .,&%6"#/6%"2*!&!7%5++2 %6"8' 9

 :% ;<&  53 " 5++4   %"7  :%"=% "&  :%!!#  >""&"&!"#&#9

55;"5++, ?"&#%##@ ''  ( ''   '     (     '   ' '   ' $ (    )"$ :%=  ".  %&">"&"!  ! !:& ""6"  !&"&"! :!% ?# 5++29

:%#""!*4;"&5++, !>"%#%!::!"&"!4:&7%5++,  ":%!##@%&">"&"!:%&"!:&9

 ?"&#%#  "&%;&# %!%  5/ :&7% 5++, !&%  #""! % !::!"&"!9

:%&"!&#&#&5+%5++A9

!"% """&%&%!"#&#>"" "&#B"&# &#!"?&C#9

?"&#%##%#6!"%!:%"!6%"!B:%!## "9

  "  :&#  :%!#% @  !%%&"! #  !"&   :%%  !"#%&"!"%6%#:%?:!D%B:!%:#%"!?6%"@;"&5++2  #&& :%#"# B ?"&#%#  %E  ""&#   ?"!67""&#  ;"& @ !&!7%5++29

 6  C:"&"!  ?"&#%# %&"6 @  !  2?+++ >%- ""&"& 6%# @ &"&%  %7!%&  >%"  #:& & >"& !"#%# :% ! :!D% ! >"& :%&"  "%  & 6  #%&"!  !"%   / !67% 5++,   "  " B "& ! 6"& F&% %#:&#"%9



&     B?!%&"&%6&%:%&"9

?"!6"&!%&C:%&"&!%B"&>":%#&"&"<9



1234,15++,  $212$  

 & /' $0  $%# & '  #& '&$

, 122    3 4 

52 - )) 6 31 7   '89

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

 !:" !>!%  :%#& %%F& & !&">"# C :%&" & @ G>>" >##%  %!":%<%>>



1234,15++,