Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/283/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/283/2005 Généré par l'IA

Government Disclosure Request and Privileges Review

Numéro de cause ATAS/283/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party sued a governmental entity seeking judicial review of a decision that denied a request for records under a public disclosure statute, asserting the denial was improper because the requested documents were not protected by the attorney-client or deliberative process privileges. The court held that while the attorney-client privilege might apply to internal legal advice, the deliberative process privilege only protects pre-decisional documents that reflect the agency's function of formulating policy or making decisions, and because the agency failed to demonstrate that the documents sought would inhibit candid discussion or reveal non-deliberative recommendations, the broad denial was not justified, thus remanding the matter for an in camera review to determine which specific portions, if any, were properly withheld.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Government Disclosure Request and Privileges Review: The court held that while the attorney-client privilege might apply to internal legal advice, the deliberative process privilege only protects pre-decisional documents that reflect the agency's function of formulating policy or making decisions, and because the agency failed to demonstrate that the documents sought would inhibit candid discussion or reveal non-deliberative recommendations, the broad denial was not justified, thus remanding the matter for an in camera review to determine which specific portions, if any, were properly withheld.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
contrôle juridictionnel secret professionnel de l'avocat politique gouvernementale avis juridiques cyberadministration transparence administrative

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision concerns the allocation of court costs and was explicitly cited in the dispositive.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

!"#$%"   & '(

" )"&

     

   

            !"# $% 

  *

&'()$" *  *+ , , -    *+ -  .   + *



*+

+    ,-&. //*  ,  01+   +  2 +*+ 3 * ,+ 33 3456 $$2"2 '$7



              

 

2 68< 2



  +  *+  =  + >>>>>>>>>>  64 +? 6::; =* //   , @>>>>>>>>>>  A

  *+  @  & BC ' D*2,E  *F  6G , 1 6::;  ,  +  - H   +E  -*2*IJ  ,  ,+  9: + K ,  < , 1 6::;  +/ . *  = + K +  ,+   +/  +  *+  = A

 -+,,++   *+  +,,++   *  39 += 1 6::;  *2* A

  *+  <: * 1 6::;  - , -   + *+ *+  *+  +,,++ *+* K + +  K  *++ .- - , *+   / /  ,+  + K -  A

 .  *+ *+  +/  + A

 .-  ,+  6; /= 6::5     ,  K -*+  +   ,+  =  1  -I+   *+*  ,   +   L   *+  *+ ,+  .   ,+*I A

 - 3;  3   +   ,+*  =  36 , 1 3MG5 D$F + . +.  + - ,+*  = ,   ++ - .+   *= =   *+ ,* -  +  / -+1 - ,+* , =  +  ,+   ,+*  = , L ,++* .-K + *+  * .+ A



 & / 0        

11"(1

2'(3' 4(15%!$)6')$1$'(1 ()$1'$ !%7 189:;

3 ++*  ,+   ,+* +,,+ + >>>>>>>>>> K @  & BC ' .-K     /+*  *I+   

8696486::;

2 <8< 2

* *  , =  1  -I+   +,,+  *+ K  +* @>>>>>>>>>>  A

6 =  *+ K    1  * E *,+      /+*  *I+    * * A

< =     ,+*

$ //E $ 

@N #O    

" *+, *+/+   , L  +/ H ,  .-K -//* /  * +* ,  // 

8696486::;