Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/27/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/27/2004 Généré par l'IA

Regulatory Interpretation of Financial Obligation Calculation

Numéro de cause ATAS/27/2004
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute involved the application of a specific regulatory provision regarding the calculation of certain financial obligations stemming from prior agreements. The court examined whether the method used by one party to determine the base amount for these obligations was consistent with the plain language and intent of the controlling statute, which mandated that the calculation be based on a verifiable market metric. The court reasoned that the regulatory provision unambiguously dictated the use of the specified external metric, and since the opposing party failed to demonstrate that their internal valuation method substantially complied with this explicit statutory requirement, their calculation was deemed improper, leading to a ruling in favor of the party that adhered to the prescribed external standard.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Regulatory Interpretation of Financial Obligation Calculation: The court examined whether the method used by one party to determine the base amount for these obligations was consistent with the plain language and intent of the controlling statute, which mandated that the calculation be based on a verifiable market metric. The court reasoned that the regulatory provision unambiguously dictated the use of the specified external metric, and since the opposing party failed to demonstrate that their internal valuation method substantially complied with this explicit statutory requirement, their calculation was deemed improper, leading to a ruling in favor of the party that adhered to the prescribed external standard.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
mode de calcul dispositions financières condition légale interprétation du contrat obligation de chiffrer les conclusions marché financier
Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

         

    $%&'((%()%)% $*$%)+%)((,

$-*

! * !$. $* $.  $!$   $.

 )& #/ )((,

)0 1 





 2222222222 





33  $* $.    $4   ! "#$%& ''()



                  !"!  #    

   *+,+* 

/0)0'%'1

2'23!450(6+5542'(0' 0'71

2'&0'1

$   * 3 . * !$. $* $.  $!$   $.

 5   6

89   $ 2     32  $ 0  (0  &  )'3 0 2)0:     0' (0)('  $  9

+9    )3 $ 2      $  3  )'' ' )'&;)$2  0&9

49 2;(36'9

#9 ;<9

"9 00''29"5 /'=(0'3>0&=(    0) !   )'  45 7 %  '='' 0 0' (() )  '6 =))  / ? @'A =3' B/ B55#   /':(0'9)'0!0C)9()(''DE ''3 :( 3> )''   )' 6'  '  0   )''3)16E:003('=''(0&'( )''1E0'C0)9?'()('' 0'))()())E6EE'*/ '6=))   0 0   ('%    3>' & ) '&69  ()('   ('   (;  0&/ 3'  7'/ '' 3  )'' 3)  >&00  3   )) :0)')F984+/85B85GE9

C=='D'' 0)'D6 6'   

 0'=( 0) !'='):0'''32$2H ?0 C==



- . -