Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/264/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/264/2004 Généré par l'IA

Finding of Fact Review on Conflicting Evidence

Numéro de cause ATAS/264/2004
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court considered whether a particular finding of fact, based on conflicting evidence, was clearly erroneous, where the dispute centered on whether an agreement required immediate performance or performance upon later notification. The trial court's finding was supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimonial evidence and the context of the parties' prior dealings, leading the appellate court to conclude that the lower court did not abuse its discretion in resolving the factual dispute, and thus affirmed the judgment.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Finding of Fact Review on Conflicting Evidence: The trial court's finding was supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimonial evidence and the context of the parties' prior dealings, leading the appellate court to conclude that the lower court did not abuse its discretion in resolving the factual dispute, and thus affirmed the judgment.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
rapports médicaux contradictoires constatation arbitraire des faits administration des preuves arrêts en appréciation de validité objet du litige contrôle juridictionnel

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Applied to impose the costs of the federal court proceedings on the appellant.
Généré par l'IA
A/485/2007
Substantial Evidence Supports Trial Court Finding
A/1493/2001
Sufficiency of Evidence Review on Appeal
A/1480/2001
Affirmation of Evidentiary Rulings on Relevance, Hearsay, and Expert Testimony
A/4501/2006
Summary Judgment Appropriateness in Cases with Genuine Factual Disputes
A/184/2005
Distinction of Precedent Based on Factual Differences

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied to impose the costs of the federal court proceedings on the appellant.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

     

    &'(((&)' "&)+(&)(

,"

 " #"   #  #

% )* - )(

'. #/ 

  

% #0000000000     !" ## $ %! ! &  '() ) * # (# )##



11# #"   2# 3" ##(  ) + ,-& . /0

          ! "#! $%

1 2341

58 % 4%  )(## ) 47  2775& '99#  ) '1 #0#)#( :#1 /  ;  #9( !# <<<<<<<<<< *  )) ) #  (# =( >

28  '#((&  ((  !" ## $ %! ! &  #=(   5? #  )# )(## >

48  )')   #&   # )  ()  (( )(   ##  )  $1  =*'. ( # ) ) ()#@  (# >

68 ' @ #  (( (A#    <<<<<<<<<<  24 9(0# 2776 >

B8  '   #    . ' (## ) $0# ()# (C# D $! >

?8   5,  2776& '    (  #A ) ( ) "    )# .   #/ . # ) 5 # 5,,, >

-8 '#0#( .  )(#& #1#  # & 0 #9#& )  ## ) '  >

58 #   4%    (( # )'99#  ( #A 9( . '# 4& 8 4 )  # ) 56 0A 2772 )#9#  #  'C## =)### :;8

28  '## )    ((  #&    )'@ #  '0# ) $! ( )(0  >

48 '# +  # )  * '     0 )  ) ) "    )# .   #/ . # ) 5 # 5,,, >

68  #1# ' )(( #9# >

B8 '#  =#9# )/  )')      >

3566632775

1 4341

 # "1  " #"   #  #

%

56   7  8   25 '+)  $

58 )      )(## ) 47  2775 >

28 # * !# <<<<<<<<<<  )# .   #/ . # ) 5 # 5,,, >

48 ) '##( . 0     ) 5'777 98& . # ) ## # .  9#  )(  >

68 9  # )  *E 0 9    ( F )  )(# ) 47 = )/  #9##  # )( )(  #A 9()( ) & $GH#IG9*# ?& ?776   &  # @ #8  )(#   F C(8  (# )# J ; #)#* @ * )(##   )(# A#  #   )  )(## *(> A; @   * #9 # # 0# ))   )(##> ;   #C   )   (8 $#  (#  #   # (( (((   ; A;  ; #1)&  #A 9()( )       #/    *E# )0 )( #0A8  (# )  #   + ) 0& *#  =#& ## *  )(## *(  E0  ) *   (( @ ()#(   :8 542& 57?  57K ;8

 C99#/ J  (#) J

!#1#  L # M   

  # 9 ) ( F  #9#( @ # ## *E. E99# 9()( )  #   C99

3566632775