Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/262/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/262/2006 Généré par l'IA

Contractual Breach Interpretation Appeal Affirmation

Numéro de cause ATAS/262/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Frais judiciaires à la charge de l'autorité
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court reviewed an appeal concerning a dispute over a prior contractual agreement regarding the sale of a business, where the appellant argued that the lower court erred in finding sufficient evidence to sustain a finding of a particular type of breach, specifically challenging the interpretation of time-related clauses in the agreement and related correspondence. The court reasoned that the evidence, including the language of the contract and subsequent communications, reasonably supported the trial court's factual findings regarding the parties' intent and the nature of the breach, concluding that the findings were not clearly erroneous and thus affirmed the judgment based on the established record and contractual interpretations.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Contractual Breach Interpretation Appeal Affirmation: The court reasoned that the evidence, including the language of the contract and subsequent communications, reasonably supported the trial court's factual findings regarding the parties' intent and the nature of the breach, concluding that the findings were not clearly erroneous and thus affirmed the judgment based on the established record and contractual interpretations.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
interprétation du contrat accords particuliers contrat d'enregistrement différend commercial manquement du bailleur réexamen d'une décision antérieure

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This article was used to order the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
C/13731/2004
Contractual Breach Affirmation
A/1553/2006
Contractual Dispute Interpretation and Breach Affirmation
A/3342/2005
Contract Interpretation and Breach Appeal Affirmation
A/3019/2005
Contract Interpretation and Breach Affirmation Appeal
A/3955/2007
Contract Interpretation and Breach of Contract Affirmation

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article was used to order the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

                

 !!!"

#  $#! "!!  # !" "$

"%&' (  ) &  



        !" #$"!% !&' !#!" $"!% ()*&+,- " * .. -!"!)/0 /11/  

#"!

22      !#3!'," #!#"$ " ,' 4! 563#"78807009%78



"

# !:::::::::: 33' 



   

   *7;5*  

! *$

0) # ! ::::::::::"!% '$0!,!7110/,!71173!9 $>>::::::::::?!)'" " ! "- "!$#,,!""@# ' $# '"'3#!3!"$0<111.!)$907.'%! !066=)

7) !' " !' ! " 3!9 $ ..  "# $ ,3#  A *3!9  B "  #  "'%!,"$ $, "'$&+,-$95,!7117)

/)  < C  7117    $ &+,- $  2 D $%   $3   0! C% ! 711< A *3!9   B  !C"'  $,$ $ $, "' $ !')  $! !.#!,'#33# " #)

5) !$'  #$78#E"7117!#3!'," #$ , @!' !,3  "  #$ " # !" % ?  3'! #$ $ #" " # " @  % " .." %," 3!F   ! $!" # " % "' 3!9 $  # '"') !'  3!F$ $, "'$&+,-$5,!7117/,!7115)

<) 5,!7115G,!711<!'.."',3# ",3#! !3!9$ H::::::::::  ) 8,!711< " !' ! "? "#  "'$ $, "'$&+,-)

=)  3!9%# !#""'@!''" " ! "- "!$#,,! "" @$,  "!"! $ 3 ! # '"'  #,  # $# ! ?  " # !*&+,-A *3!9 DB. @* $'"!, #3" "$ 3,"$5,!7117/,!7115"$98,!711<)

G) !$'  #$8C "711< D '$!# "? $, "'$&+,-$ !'?#,3"!$8,!711<) "!%&3"!'," 9!! 3'! #$$5,!7117/,!7115,#" .@-!#3!'," #% " $'C?"!&'@" #$$'  #$$'  #$78#E"7117)

8)  G 3",I! 711<  !'"! " $ "" ? '##,  A )3!9  B  .#!,' #33# " #?$'  #$ D. "%# !@* '" "?"#!"3 "!'," 9!!3'! #$$5,!7117/,!7115) " , " @!'$% "J"!$'!' 3"3,"$90<#"#I!7117)

6) % "' ?  $'"!, ! !'  # @ #33# " # $   '" " 3 !%I)

01) ! $'  # $ 7/ $',I! 711<  -!#3 !'," # $    3!" ,"$, #33# " #$ "$!'3!##'!%# $ ? D. @K, 3" "$3,"$!'3#! 3'! #$$5,!7117/,!7115"#. !,'3#!!33" "$ 3," $ !' $9  8 ,! 711< # $'$" # $ -  "!,'$  !



;7</;711=  */;5*   !' '3#!#,3"$# '"'>:::::::::: "L:::::::::: C@? !$ " #$- "!$#,,!)

00) ! " $ 7< C% ! 711=     "!C"' !#! #"!  $'  # ! #33# " # $   #" ?  @  $!# " K $, "' $ &+,- $ !'$98,!711<# " ')

07)  71 .'%! ! 711=    "!,   $# ! " 3! "' $  "!, $  $'  #) 





!  $

0) #.#!,',"?M!")<=$# !M#!- " #C$   !AB ! I "#$!# "#,3'""3#!""!$3!'")

7) "!$!")G0$# !3!#'$!$,  "!" %$073",I!068< A B "#! "' 3" $#..  # ! !@J" #!$#! 33   $ " ! $#"   "" # C! $ @ " 3" I $J"! .."' 3!   $ 3!#'$!)     @ 9!"  $!# " " #I -" # $ 3!"  "  $'  # ! $% "#33#I)

/) 39 " $' I@ "" #C! $ @$# !:::::::::: 3#!! " J"! .."' 3!   $  3!'" 3!#'$!    ! I $ ' 3!% " ?  # # @   3 $!# " K $, "' $ &+,- $9  8 ,!711<))

C" . 3!#'@"$33!)







NNNN









;7</;711=  *5;5*    " +$*   $#! "!!  # !" "$

  ,,-&

0) 33# !::::::::::))

7)   ,3!" "      .  3#! #"!  $# ! $   "  $'"!, !)         !' $"P -!.. !     O $       

#3 #.#!,$3!'"#!$#"#" . 'K3!" 3!-!..



;7</;711=