Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/260/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/260/2005 Généré par l'IA

Transactional Agreement Dispute Dismissal

Numéro de cause ATAS/260/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The petitioner sought to recover damages related to a transactional agreement, presenting multiple arguments across various sections of the submission, including alleged breaches and misrepresentations concerning the agreed-upon terms and resulting financial outcomes, relying heavily on comparing specific contractual clauses with the actual events. The court reviewed the submissions and determined that the evidence presented failed to establish a clear basis for the asserted claims under the relevant legal standards, ultimately concluding that the petitioner had not demonstrated the requisite entitlement to the relief sought under the executed understanding.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Transactional Agreement Dispute Dismissal: The court reviewed the submissions and determined that the evidence presented failed to establish a clear basis for the asserted claims under the relevant legal standards, ultimately concluding that the petitioner had not demonstrated the requisite entitlement to the relief sought under the executed understanding.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
dommages-intérêts contractuels règlement du litige contrat possessoire action en constatation production de créance résolution du contrat

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Cited in the dispositive for the allocation of judicial costs.
Généré par l'IA
A/1553/2003
Contractual Breach Damages Claim Dismissed
A/3711/2006
Contract Interpretation and Misrepresentation Claims Dismissed
A/1745/2003
Property Transaction Disputes and Contractual Breaches Appeal
A/99/2005
Contractual Damages Causation Dispute
A/4581/2006
Contractual Breach Compensation Dispute Dismissed

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Cited in the dispositive for the allocation of judicial costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               "#$%"$&&' "$(&"$&&'

))

 )  *   )* *

(+  *,   %&  $&&' 



- .////////// 



0 * 1 ! "# !!() $ !%&"'

                 !

   .+*-.  

 2

%/ "/ 01111111111 )  %% (! %23&  )) )   ! 4)$)  5.($!$%6(%2237 "89:$; !($!.

!$ 7!.9:  !8 $ % <#! +,,+  &% $)(= +,,3 #  4>!$4/%5-,,/./!4(9$$:+?)! $4/+23/.+,,3!4/+2&/.(9$@$)$!$4/%/.!$ '$@#!(/

+/ %A4)#!+,,3!#B)C@)9999!($ 9!($<#!+,,3($4/+2&/./$99))#B)%? ( +,,3 9  9!( $  9!( $ 4)#! +,,3   !!:( 99 (!+,#!+,,399!($9!($(+,,3/

&/ %?(+,#!%6(!+,,3!!4!)!((!9 9!($9!(9)!)/

3/  +A D +,,3  !  !4!) C @)  (($( $ 9B 9!E,3+,+A?2(($4/6A2/.!!F4/%-,/.$4!$99 ((!/@)B4!99!!69(=+,,3/

-/ $)!!$%+=+,,3!#)@99!!$@)/

?/ %2#(=+,,3@)4!99!!C$)!!$%+=+,,3 #F@!@#!C<G'9!!4!(!<$ ()()(H(F@!$($!#!$9!$)(=+,,+) $  (9/  !  4>! $ 4/ %5-,,/. $#! H 9!  !$)!/

A/ +3#(=+,,3!<)@99!!$@)9)!F ($4/6A2/.9$!C&'+2&/.9(!$<#!C(+,,3/  #! $ @.($! ! #! 4!() F @) @)! 9  =))4! $ =#!/  @#! 9  $@ $($ $ @) $ ) $ @)  $)(= +,,+ (! #! F@ #! (! C @)&,=+,,&#)$(9H)6=+,,&/

6/ %A<#!+,,-@) !=$! C@$$)!!99!!#F@!!(($ (($($9BF@!@#!99=!$9!$)(=+,,+ )$(979!($9!(!(9B)8!!F$)$!$ =#! /   $)(9 9! #! )) (! 9  ! F@!$($!$)(9I=((F!! $9!($.9!F!!)!$/



*%+&*+,,-  .&*-.   2/ +A<#!+,,-!<$#F$ $9!($<#!C(+,,3)!$D/

%,/ $($$ !=$)#!$@.($!!$!F)6 (+,,-F@)@#!9G$=!$$9!+,,%<F@C</

 )

%/ !I#!@I!!<$!!!78))($!4!)!!)$: %D+,,& !=$!(9)$-<I $9)!$#!.9)!$-99)%?<I7/%/ -? 8/

!C@!$@)!$%?<I9 !=4)$) +A<#!+,,37 J%&,%,?8$ !I#!$9)%&4)#!  $!9!!!!I9( !=$ ! $ !)I   C ! <I !!  $ @ $ @)!$#'<I/

(9)9<I$$@9:!!)=!/

+/ <)  (9 ! $#  <!$!! (9)    #= 7/-?/%/>/3K/?,$!4)$)9!I))$ $!$!$?=+,,,L 8/

&/ '($@/?%/% "@4!'($9!(C9B 9)/ 4$!9!!!$9)!@9):#$ 9!()I9:$)/

@/ 2, / % C & $ @$  5.($! $ +A <! %22- 7 "89)#!F9!($!#H9B)C@#9!!9 (!7/%8/'$!)H(!99!()>@/+? /% @):#C-M9)7/+8/ !$)9!$@((!@) 9!99!(9!!9! 'D)>@$!II 9)$$9!/ !9)$=!C$$)4$=! @  !4( @!) (9) $@!$ !/  )#)  $!9!!F!9)#!9)=C@!)>I)$ )$!$9!(7/&8/

@/?-/% "9)#!F$$)$!$9!( ' )$ $!!)(!F($/  !4)$)9 )$ $B$!C$9$@F!@9$$(!!  !(!F!B)<$4G9I)/



*%+&*+,,-  .3*-.   C@/??/% "!9)#!F 4)$)!$' $=!$$!)C)$!9!($/?-C?- "/

@/ %2 / % $  ! $@99!! $   " $ +2 (! %22A 7 "8 9)#! F@ # $ ! ?-  ??  " @  $ :# $ $ =!$ $!) C  #   9! $ 9!( $ @.

($!$)$$!!)(!F($/

=!$#)$!('9H!)I($)$! $9!($B$!/ !$@ 4!'9:I(($!)$ 9!(7/+2 "8/

3/  @9: @)  )) (! C   $@.($! =!I!    " $ % <#! +,,+  &% $)(= +,,3/ @I! $ @) +,,3  #! $ @.($!  4!() F@! @)!  =))4! $@ =!$/  9!( !(9B) 9  (! $ <#! C ( +,,3 $ 4/+2&/. 9 (!   )F $ !! F  4! $ ((!  4/%-,/. 9)# 9 @/ 6 $ $!! $@ $ % <#! +,,,/ @I!9!$$($$!I()(!9@)4 $  F  ! B  )9$ $  ! $ &, = +,,&  $)!$9!$9@)B)')/

-/ #$F!9):$<)@99!!(($($ 9BE,3+,+A?2#)/



*%+&*+,,-  .-*-.  

) * 2  )  *   )* *



34-5-   6  7-- -  8! #($ 9

  5- 

%/ )#=/

 5-

+/ </

&/   (!#) $)4!!!# $ @99!!  (($( $ 9B E,3+,+A?2/

3/ 4(  9! $  F@ 9# 4(    9) H $  $)! $ &, < $:  !4!! 9 9! (($) $)  != 4)$) $  >N!O>4F! ? ?,,3     ! '(9!/  $)!  9 H 9I)/  ()(! $!P 8 !$!F '(F$)!!$)!=!!9$$)!! F)K =8 '9 9 F (!4 ! !( 9#! $($   $)!!K 8 9  !I   $  9)/ !  ()(!  ! 9  ! ))( )())   8 =8  8 !.$  !=4)$)$99(!:F@! $#$)!#=/()(!$(!(B $ 9# F!  <! !! F  $)!! F)  @#99 $ F))'9)$!)7/%&+%,?%,68/  I44!:P  )!$P   B  )!"   

9!4($9)H!4!)'9!!!F@C@44!4)$) $)9=!F9I44



*%+&*+,,-