ATAS/256/2005 · Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

ATAS/256/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/256/2005 Généré par l'IA

Fee Disputes in Post-Judgment Enforcement Actions

Numéro de cause ATAS/256/2005

Autorité / Tribunal Cour de Justice (Cour civile) · Chambre des assurances sociales

Juridiction

Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)

Date de la décision 2005-03-15

Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)

Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case addresses several fee disputes arising from the enforcement of a judgment, specifically concerning whether fees for services rendered after the initial judgment were improperly awarded under pre-judgment stipulations that limited attorney's fees to a lower amount for services rendered up to the time of judgment. The court reasoned that the stipulated fee cap applied only to services performed up to the entry of the initial judgment, and post-judgment enforcement actions, including supplemental proceedings, warranted separate, reasonable attorney's fees not restricted by the initial contractual limitation, thus upholding the post-judgment fee awards.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Fee Disputes in Post-Judgment Enforcement Actions: The court reasoned that the stipulated fee cap applied only to services performed up to the entry of the initial judgment, and post-judgment enforcement actions, including supplemental proceedings, warranted separate, reasonable attorney's fees not restricted by the initial contractual limitation, thus upholding the post-judgment fee awards.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA

procédure d'exécution fixation des honoraires d'avocat frais de poursuite perception d'émoluments épuration de l'état des charges droit d'entrée

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Imposed costs for the federal appeal proceedings.

Généré par l'IA

A/4520/2006

Judgment Enforcement Fee Dispute

A/1841/2002

Settlement Enforcement and Attorney's Fees Dispute

A/2535/2006

Contractual Fee Dispute and Enforcement

A/2395/2003

Cost and Fee Award Interpretation and Allocation Dispute

A/619/2004

Dispute Over Agreement Validity and Enforcement of Charges

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Imposed costs for the federal appeal proceedings.

Texte complet

#$%&'#())* #(+'#())+

, ", - ,- -

$. /0 1 ! $+ ())+

2222222222 2222222222 ! " # $ ! % &'! ''

! 2222222222 '! '''&# ! ' ((# ' ) *+# &!& " ,)", - ./'! . # 0' (1 2 *+

- 3- -,- 4 -- &3 ' 4!'' 5 2 *+

5 3- 6 -- ' )! (6

5 , # ! 7 5866 9 -

! " ! ) 6:;)

(, >?! (@ >' 688=# (1* 0A 'A '* '! & '+ " "BBBBBBBBBB & .BBBBBBBBBB# C8 &A (<@8# ! "' "BBBBBBBBBB# & 1 >'! (<11# '& ! C8 ' (<<8,

6, . >?! &'!&# !? '!'& +' &+/ 3' %' ! '? &!& &,

C, >?! '+ ! + &3''!'3 6; D! 688=,

=, 'A & ''!& !' '!'!!' &+/# ' '! & '!'!!' &3 '! '

'% !! +' !' %' ! '?# '! ! C8 ' (<<8 ! 6; D! 688=,

;, . ' E &+/ $ 61 +A 688=# ' &+/ !!' ! E!' &!'+ (8 &A 688=# !!' %' ! '? !

!'+! 1F<85 3, =;# 5F(58 3, <8 ! 1F;(8 3, 6;# '! !! 6(F;<< 3, 18,

1, 3'& (6 +A 688= $+' !'& * $ '!'!!' &+/,

@, ! ! &!& !' G !' ! @ >+' 688;, >''!' ''%& %F2 &3! FA+!' F'' = 3&+' 688;# H! '! !! A,

5, FA FA>!' &' 3'G&# &!& ?& 2 >?,

(, F!, 6; ' 3&& 'A ? &+/ 3'# +''# +'+! ! '+''!& (@ &A (<<C IEJ# !& +'? ( >+' 6888# *? & '+, % >'! ! $ !!' !' 2 !? I!, (66 !

:(5<1:688= ) C:;)

(6C '+' ) J# >? ' '+ &!! F!, @C , ( ' 3&& &+/ 3' 6; >' (<56 IJ# '! 2 *+ 'A ! ' ' ( D! 688C# '!# * % F33' ' &!& !' I!, (=6 J# G&! F33' !? A & & !'!' &!'& >? '+.

6, . F!, 66 E I+ ! +'? ' ( >+' 6888J# '+# !!' !' %' ! '? ! !?& 3&! G !, (66# (6C# (=( ! (=6 K !, C 2 ; E F '%!

?' !! 2 !3& I, (J, 0% >'!# !!' !' 2 !? 2 '33& ! !!' !'# ?!& +' 'A ? G'!! &+!! ! '+# ! !!' !'# ?!& +' 'A ? G'!!

&+!! ! ' '? I3, !, 6= EJ, # >! 2 !!' !' ! 2 F+' 'A ? G'!! ! ' '? '!&H! ! '+ I E (65 6C8K E (6< ===J,

C, $ *# >? '* '! & !? '!'& +' &+/ 3' %' , ! !'! !# $ !# '?# C8 ' (<<8# $! ! 6;

D! 688=# ! 2 % >?! '+ ! + G&!',

. ! '!# !!' %' ! '? ! 6(F;<< 3, 18# '!&H! /! &>2 &!& & '!'!!' &+/ &3, '' '! 2 G)

& !! (8F@<< 3, 58 3, I6(F;<< 3,18 L 6J,

=, 3&! 2 >' # ' > &!'! !? >%F ! !3! !!' !' # >'! '+& A&&3''' !! !!' '! 2 '!&H! !' !! )', '!&H! ! & !G '' &? F!, (6 F &+/ 3' +''# +'+! ! '+''!& (5 +' (<5= I 6J !G &?!'# ' ')' ! &' I E A'& C1:86 (5 >'!

688CJ

;, &! M# & &!! ?!'! I!, @C , 6 !

5<- , ( ' & ''!!'+ (6 !A (<5;J,

:(5<1:688= ) =:;)

- 5 ", - ,- - ! 7/8 9 : 6; $'( <

(, +'! E &+/ $ # 2 !3& '!'& +' "' "BBBBBBBBBB# '! CF=;= 3, 68 I1F<85 3, =; L 6J ! 'A ? N 66;<;C6 * % ! *+ 3+ " "BBBBBBBBBB & .BBBBBBBBBB,

6, +'! E &+/ $ # 2 + !!# '!&H! !' !G &!'& '&!# * 6; D!

688= >%F ! !3!,

C, +'! ' &+/ !!'# 2 !3& '!'& +' "' 'O "BBBBBBBBBB# '! =$8<8 3, =; I5$(58 3, <8 L 6J ! 'A ? N 66;<;C6 * % ! *+ 3+ " "BBBBBBBBBB & .BBBBBBBBBB,

=, +'! ' &+/ !!'# 2 + !!# '!&H! !' !G &!'& '&!# * 6;

D! 688= >%F ! !3!,

;, +'! E!' &!'+ # 2 !3& '!'& +' "' "BBBBBBBBBB# '! C$6;; 3, (; I1$;(83, 6; L 6J ! 'A ? N 66;<;C6 * % ! *+ 3+ " "BBBBBBBBBB & .BBBBBBBBBB,

1, +'!# E!' &!'+ 2 + !!# '!&H! !' !G &!'& '&!# * 6; D! 688= >%F ! !3!,

@, / !! % A',

5, '! % & ! ?!'!, <, 3 !' %F +! 3 ! &! H!

&' C8 > * !'3'!' ' & & 'A 3&& # .0P'Q03%' 1# 188= # !' G ', &' ! H! ?&, &' '! L J ''% G!! % &'' ! &' A!' ' ! &'' !!%&K AJ G % !'3 ' !' +' !!

:(5<1:688= ) ;:;)

! &''K J ! '?! &!!, .' &' !'! !' &&! &&& !! J AJ ! J ')# 'A 3&& ! !'* %F' + & '+A, &' !' / +# %' ! >'!# '' % &'' !!%& ! F+ % &!& G &'& ! I!, (C6# (81 ! (85 J,

?33'*L &'! L

"')' 9 ' R

' 3 &! H! ! !'3'& G !' '' %$2 $33' 3&& ' ?33

:(5<1:688=

Fee Disputes in Post-Judgment Enforcement Actions

Synthèse Legislator

Regeste Legislator

Mots-clés

Dispositions légales citées

Décisions connexes

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Texte complet