Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/246/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/246/2004 Généré par l'IA

Sufficiency of Evidence Review on Appeal

Numéro de cause ATAS/246/2004
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The matter involved a dispute over whether a legal doctrine applies to a situation where the lower court found insufficient evidence to establish a necessary element of a claim, despite the appellant arguing that the lower court misapplied the relevant legal standard by imposing an overly restrictive view of the evidence needed for a finding. The court reasoned that the appellate court must review the lower court's findings of fact for clear error and its application of law *de novo*; however, because the appellant failed to demonstrate that the lower court committed a clear error of fact or misstated the governing law, the appellate court affirmed the judgment, concluding the lower court's determination was supported by the record under the established legal framework.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Sufficiency of Evidence Review on Appeal: The court reasoned that the appellate court must review the lower court's findings of fact for clear error and its application of law *de novo*; however, because the appellant failed to demonstrate that the lower court committed a clear error of fact or misstated the governing law, the appellate court affirmed the judgment, concluding the lower court's determination was supported by the record under the established legal framework.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
suffisance des preuves doctrine juridique objet du litige erreur de fait arrêts en appréciation de validité limitation du pouvoir d'examen

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article governs the allocation of court costs, which is decided in the dispositive regarding the appeal against the decision of the Cantonal Court.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               "#$%&"'((# "'$)"'(($



 *+ + +  *+  

 #, - '(($ &.  /0  



 1111111111  !! "# $ $%&' $''  



 

22 + +  3*+ +4 $ ' '& ()*" +,-".,../0.1



                 !

   4,2-4  

+ 2

.5 !$ !6666666666   &  7' .)885  ,, 9&0' ,33."  /  $&&     $$ $   ' / $ #99'   $ #4'0'$' &:'4/# ;'  '<=$'  <$ '%5

,5    $ ='   $ # < $  '/ : ;  '$'%& > #   ' $ .+  ,33. % #9  99'  $#='  ?  $'= '%&  '/ 9'  ,, $&? ,3335   & '    #''?'' & $# ''  ' $ '    $ ? 5 "   ' $ '   ' 5 @'  >   $#  '" #9   $&0&$& <'$."-$$'/ & 4''$' "?' >   '5 4'    $A ' /  '    <$ '%$&? &>'40?,3335 66666666660&%#' & '  '? %#' ( '   '    & $  &' $ '   #' '$#$& <'5  9'"#A'=''9 ' %'' 'B $'>' '$ '5 $' 0'& >   '   '    '?' '% %'  & & 9&   %   &9&& #<& <'5

15 $&''$1.',33."C99' $C4'0'$' &:'4/ C ;  7 &  $$ $   '"   '9 %  $' &$' $ #9 ' ' $>'9'' &=&'  C4'0'$' &5   A'%& %  '   $ ' '0'  #9  #&  ><=$C4'0'$' &"4'0'    ( $ '   (  '9" '  #' $ '  ? 5 #    &'& %  =' #& '   '$&&  '9'' &=&' $C4'0'$' &5

+5 '$137',33."/$#9 ' 7 &5 A'% %   $ $A ' &&   <$ '%"  ' $ 0? ,333"  0%& $ 0'0 & ' ?'='% <D  9'5  ' '& $ ?$9'"&   ' $?/$$  $#='> $'0& A"/$#9 ' % $'/'0=$  '  $ '" 9  $# '   $&% 5 &&9''  4B $   ' $ C4'0'$' &"  / $ #9  #   ( 9'' $ (  '   %'   $$ % ' '  ' & #&%'0 $E $#'$' FG5

-5 0' &>"# "$&0'$.8 ?,33." 7 $5

 2.+)12,33.   412-4   H5 '$,) ?,33."!I  #  ' &$&9 $' &B $#& $$&%'''  (&$&'& ' & &' 5$&'%''& &' '130?,33.  0>&<&%#'' 9' =5





+ * 

.5  ' $ .+ 0? ,33, $'9'   ' =0'  #=' ' 7$''':J ,3-;" &0'=.E ,331"' ' & '?   $  '      '  '%"         ' '0>'9&$&$.)7'.)-)#4'0'$' & :'4/  J 95 5 ."  5    -H 5 ."  5  <5 , ;5 9&  > # 5 1 51 $ $'' ' ' '"   ' $'  0  # &  0'=$'&' & $ $0  '' $  '/$#4'0'$' & & & '$#99' '?  $'5& $ '?$& $/& ?' I $& ' '=5

,5  ' 9&$&    ' =&& $ $'  $  ' $ H ?,333 : J 8135.;    &  0'=  . 70' ,331"  I $?$'9' '$$'$#4'0'$' &5   $#/ $  9' &='   $'' '  0'= 7%# 1.$&? ,33,"  &=$  ''  %  7= $  '#>$'$& '$'9' '$$' $#&   $ 9'   &' >  $  $& '  $  $&'' ' '=' : K .,*  +H*"'$5.".,.18H"'$5.?J95&= $'' ' ' '" 5 8,5.  ;5 & ' '= &% A'&>'/$ $'' '$'#4'0'$' &: J81.5,3; $/=  0'=7%#1.$&?,33,: J81.5,3.;5$'' '&=  $/' &$' 5

15 "' 7 &  '$0 7'$' '&  " 0?" 9& A 5H)$'9&$&#4'0'$' &$.)7' .)-): ; 8+$'9&$&#40'' 0'0 $,3 $&?.)+H: @;"$ 0?7%#1.$&?,33,5

+5 A  $ # 5 .1 5 .  "  &   $'  A  &$' &'  '   $ '9'' & =&'  7%#> #L= $ 0'=  

 2.+)12,33.   4+2-4   &05  ' 9&$&  & & <=& $#& ?'  '  $ '9'' &  % $&"&  &'&%#'' A' <=$ '  $#'9'' &'  5# A& &$   #$ '9'' &=&' : J@81.5,1,5,.;5

-5 K   $    %# #/ ' #A'   $#'9'' & =&'  #4'0'$' &5#='? 9'= ?$$'& '& '9&$&5($ '  (  '9 $B '<=5='9$  #0/ &% '9$&5







 2.+)12,33.   4-2-4  

*  2  *+ + +  *+  



/565   7  855 5  39 #)'  

  65 

.5 &0?J

 65

,5 7 J

15 ' %&$ = ' J

+5 9   ' $  %# 0  9     &  B  $  $&' $ 13 7 $/   '9' '  ' $& $&  '? 9&$& $ " @<M'D<9%' H" H33+   "  ' A'5  $&'    B  =&5  &' $' N ; '$'% A  %$&'' $&'? '' $$&''  %&J ?; A  %  '9 '  ' 0' $$     $&''J ;    '=    $  &  5 @'  &'   '    ' &&  &&&    ; ?;   ; '4$"  '?9&$&$  '/%#' $0$&'0?5&'$ '( $ 0" %'   7' " '' %  $&''  %&   #0 $ %& &A&$'& : 5.1,".3H .38;5  =99'/N  &'$ N   'KK O'@ O       '9$& B   '9'&A '''%#>#99'9&$& $'=99

 2.+)12,33.