Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/241/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/241/2007 Généré par l'IA

Claimant Fails to Medically Substantiate Inability to Perform Light Work

Numéro de cause ATAS/241/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court reviewed a challenge to the denial of benefits, where the claimant failed to demonstrate that their claimed inability to engage in their former work or any substantial gainful activity was supported by medical evidence, as the treating physician's opinions were inconsistent or not fully supported by objective findings; therefore, the court affirmed the finding that the claimant had residual functional capacity to perform light work, thus supporting the denial of disability benefits.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Claimant Fails to Medically Substantiate Inability to Perform Light Work: The court reviewed a challenge to the denial of benefits, where the claimant failed to demonstrate that their claimed inability to engage in their former work or any substantial gainful activity was supported by medical evidence, as the treating physician's opinions were inconsistent or not fully supported by objective findings; therefore, the court affirmed the finding that the claimant had residual functional capacity to perform light work, thus supporting the denial of disability benefits.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
révision de prestations d'invalidité capacité de travail moyens de preuve médicaux inexigible malgré l'atteinte corporelle preuve insuffisante d'aggravation médicale droit à la prestation d'assurance

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings, citing this article.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



                 



! "#! $%  !$ %$"

$&'(   )  '            !"""#     $!$%    !%$    &&     '  ($)"*$""+ "$ "%"# ",,")-    

    

   ,1.4,  

)  * +)5$#""!1-5%6$122-'&&         !7"$# $ !55!"%"!  14 !)6$ 122- 5$ '&&     ' 8",5$9' : 5$!!#5"!$!"%   ; '""%#  '$,<=> 5!$  $#  "+ *!$ $"!!6!*%"7"#;%$%"!"7"?#1/*"% 122-@

'$#"%$*%#$!$A*)"$1223!%$#""!$!55!"%"!@

5$%"!%#%#%-$1223@

 '   )  ?5"%"! 7!$" 5$ '$#   #  #""!  /B #6$122-@





$     +'!$%"%$)%$5$%"@

'"!)"%!$%?5$%"%!$+"%7"5$#%"%">@





./0.1223  ,4.4,  

 $ ,%"-  "#! $%  !$ %$"

)

./ * '' 0 1 2        13 4 5 %67

/C !%;' +'"%'!$'$#""!/B#6$ 122-C 1C 'D!%%+6!"C 4C "%+5$!#$%>$%"%C AC 55"%"!E$%CF2 "7!$5$%"+E5)%7!$$ $!$!%$5$#%$$G%#"42*!$9!%"7"%"!5$9  $"67##$8(<H"I$<!7+"- -22A  : 5$)!"$!$  %"9$  $!"% 56" !7!$#% ? $%C 01    !" 7##$ $  $"6 7##$  /3 *" 122F 8 &:@  #!"$  $!$ !"% ""+$  !"! !%"7%!D5$)%5!$%$">%$$!$%! !%"$@"!"%G%$$# $"67##$5$)!"5!%!5$)!" #%$!"+ ? !"%"!  '$%C A1  &C  5$#% $$G% %  5"9  5!"!$!$% ")!+#!!D5$) !")%G%$*!"%; ')!"C  >$77"9$  $#"%K     $",!"  J !$"L   

 !5"!7!$ 5$#% $$G%%!%"7"#?5$%"%($#%$"%E %%; E#!!"5$>$77



./0.1223