Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/235/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/235/2007 Généré par l'IA

Challenge to Administrative Removal Order Based on Notice Defect

Numéro de cause ATAS/235/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Frais judiciaires à la charge de l'autorité
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The matter concerns a challenge to the enforcement of an administrative order directing the removal of improvements on property, where the challenging party claimed the order was void due to defective notice and insufficient time for compliance, arguing their reliance on prior communications suggested a different timeline. The court reasoned that the statutory requirements for notice were strictly met, as the notice was properly served, and the prescribed time for compliance was mandatory, thus rejecting the argument that prior informal communications created a legal right to further delay or rendered the explicit statutory notice defective.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Challenge to Administrative Removal Order Based on Notice Defect: The court reasoned that the statutory requirements for notice were strictly met, as the notice was properly served, and the prescribed time for compliance was mandatory, thus rejecting the argument that prior informal communications created a legal right to further delay or rendered the explicit statutory notice defective.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
conformité administrative droit d'enlèvement autorisation d'exécution avis des défauts condition légale violation des formes substantielles

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Costs are imposed on the respondent who lost the appeal.
Généré par l'IA
A/2619/2022
Challenge to Eviction and Legal Administration Inadmissible
A/1985/2006
Statutory Notice Requirement Regarding Property Location Sufficiency
C/18358/2019
Tenant Termination Notice Challenge Appeal
A/4244/2016
Property Owner Challenges Administrative Order for Permit Application
A/548/2001
Unauthorized Alteration Demolition Order Appeal Inadmissibility

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Costs are imposed on the respondent who lost the appeal.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



               "#$%&"$''(  "$#&"$'')



+ *+    +* 

,-.  #  / -  $'') 



 !"#$! %& ' "#"

"# !"#$!   !#()* $)""#+$)"", -

)

  -  - -!(""..!() "$2" /0./!   

1    --  +-- !()!   

               !

  436  

 0

.8 9:#)"4494007!.4;#<#=" ="(#;) ($"*""#. !$. .>7?!)  !$.>7>!@+$))#$")"/09) .>>A8

48 <227""()2"9:#)($)$! ="(#;) "$():(#)$"*"($*B(2@( <"$(C")#:8

/8  9:#) " "* ) "* "$2)2  4> D) 4007 )  $)$ )# "+22 ="$?()#=4007(C$)"():8

58  = " $  )$ " ()  # " EF )))EF " ($*B! (  )($  ))) "$2"   () "  ##@#))"*"()@")#:!) )/09).>>A)4>D)40078

68 -+:)""#"!+)*$$G

, @+#$*(;"1 -    -  !()$#)H#:I@)* $)$ )# H    - - - 1   

1 - %J-- %  !H@$)$22$.AD) .>>?!*)"+K))2$$!4000!#()"=(: H  1       --    H ! ( H  1       --   4            - , 3 HL)!2!H --    M     -  -      N-        - 1   -   N -        E  F") "4.2$*4007I

, @+  $)$ $:#) 22$ H  -    O  ) H  1       --      ---  E1       --     F @ ) )) "C$:#))2$$*H  I

, @  )2$$H))))$"+*""#" C  -  - -4>#4007I@)*+$*)! 4>D)4007!H18.A+45A8/68

78 )H"#"!)((G

    3/45634007 /36  

, @+ + $)$ 22$ @+H #() " . 9) 4005!  1-  M    -  ---  -%&  - E%  FI@*"($*B$)$)#!")" .5 9 4006! H  1       --   +- H LI@)*+$*)!4>D)4007H.0+/A>8668

A8  "#) ) $)$ )# C ()  ") " .> 2$* 400A8  9")"@$@+H"$2)"+=*)"+4?2$*400A!K) )"))=8

?8 +="+=9)""$2C$!$)$:"$H9:8

 *

.8 +)846"2$"$=(:"($*B(2! *!**))*")$".A"$#=.>>/E1F!)$*: .9*4000!;:($"""*8@9)) ("N"())")H():E)8.44).4/ " *, F! 9:"""*#($))"+)8A/8."2$"$ ($*B (2 " 46 9 .>?4 EF! ) H ;*  = )""(.D)400/!")!(;@+22  $)$)#E)8.54 F!C$)"+22():=" $" $())"$)#$(9:""*8

48 -+)8441E*)*:"(.9*4000F! " "*!  ()) " ) @ ")  #: ) ():$ 2#$#) C)8.44!.4/!.5.).54 I)8/H6 1+((@) (:#))H)2$E8.F8<@9)!())" )H():("H"22$)())")!:#)$ " * " = (: C)) $*)#)  ##) " "*! )  ())")!:#)$"*"=(:C))$*)#) ##)""#:E28)8451F8!9) H  ()) " ) ) H +* " = (: C))  ##) "   " #:  )$K) "  ##) " "* E 1 .4?  4/0I 1.4>555F8

 N(;!  9: " (#; )  "$  (): ( #)$ " ()) " ) @ ")  #: (  "#"8  ") ()))!"N()!"#:!/09).>>A!"N)()4> D)4007!")H@9:#)""*)"*C$)8

/8 -  "#) (")!  ()) @ (")  #: (  "#")"18.A+45A8/6)"@@("#"+$;* H 18 .0+/A>866!  )$K) B) "$9H $)$ $ (  ))) "

    3/45634007 536  

($*B"$2"8 "#"")HC,$(#))" 18 ?+74/8A0 E.A+45A8/6 G 4F  @+  ")  ## " 18 6+.?>8?0 E.0+/A>866G 4F! " ) @ N)  "$2)*  "#" @ ") H  C, $(#))"18/+5//8>08

58 2#$#) H  9("! "(  9 "$)#) (  (): 9@+##)")2)"())")""#!9) "*$=$$2"))())")H")$K)#() #)) " ,8  )$K) ) $  )C ### $:  +)8.4" +"   ($*B (2 *! **) ) *")$ " .? * .>?5 E 4F   )C $:#)!  , ) ($E 1(=$/7304".?9)400/F

68  $##)   (P!  ($" $)) :)) E)8 A/ 8 4  ) ?>%8."($""#))*".4()#=.>?6F8



QQQ



    3/45634007 636  

*   0  *+    +* 



12343 -- 5  633  3   7 ! /($ 8

.8 *)    -   - - H )2$! " #() "   !  ## " 18 /+5//8>0 H  1       --   +-  2* " "#   !  @ " )$K) #()""$)!";/0D)40079@+##)" )2)8

48 NB"#))@"=8

/8 )@($"):))8

58 2#  () "  @+ (*) 2#  )  ($) K) "  "$ " /0 9 ";  )2) ( ( ##"$ "$  = 2$"$ " ! -<RS<2@ 7! 7005   !  ) C#(8  "$  () K) (:$8  #$# ") G F "@ C)#) @ "$  ) "$ =)   ) ( "  "$))@$I=FC((@#)2)#(*"#")) )"$IF():)"($))8-#$#  )) (  ) $$#) $#$$  )) F =F ) F ,"!  =2$"$"(()#);@+ "*"$*=8#$#"#)#B " (*! @ ) 9)!  @  "$ ))@$ ) +*(( " @$)$C($"$)E)8./4!.07).0?F8 :22;  $")G           11 O- O 

(2#"($)K)))2$C()@NHN222$"$ "(:22

    3/45634007