Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/219/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/219/2007 Généré par l'IA

Statute of Limitations on Accounting Agreement Claim

Numéro de cause ATAS/219/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party sought review of a decision that dismissed its claim for recovery against another party related to an accounting agreement, arguing the lower court erred in determining the claim was time-barred under the relevant statute of limitations. The court reasoned that the record supported the finding that the claim accrued outside the statutory period because the facts demonstrated the claimant had sufficient knowledge or reason to know of the alleged deficiency much earlier than when the suit was filed, and the relevant statutory provision specifically limited the time to bring an action based on a written instrument, thereby affirming the dismissal.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Statute of Limitations on Accounting Agreement Claim: The court reasoned that the record supported the finding that the claim accrued outside the statutory period because the facts demonstrated the claimant had sufficient knowledge or reason to know of the alleged deficiency much earlier than when the suit was filed, and the relevant statutory provision specifically limited the time to bring an action based on a written instrument, thereby affirming the dismissal.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
délai de prescription limites légales provision pour risques et charges délai de contrôle moment du dépôt contentieux contractuel

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



                 !"

##$

 # %& '%%& $ #%'$ ' &$

'()   *  ) " 



 !"#$!%&'( ) *





*

++     , --    !" *#$ .&'!   



       

   51/(5  

!6$7", 8

79",:: "-*", "968

;""#7*7"7*"4#133'!"< *"$$<*=>*$#*?"$**$!#$**" *$ ,* 7$@$ 7< @,$* **#* 7A " *6 "7  % "$#A1330*<@7*$?"03B"7(*A1334C #",**7:"$7,:: "**#* :#",7*",*D"$*E#**6","$" * #! ",* 7*! "  :#*< FG"! H! ** " AIC  :#J*7A"6#?"03B*@**"$ #    7 "$*# 6  , :* "  7$:$ 7 ,** H    *D " $*E#*C -  " # #$"! @, "$7$ 79 " ,:: 6  %4 *A 1334!  6 "#" " 7**!6"$*$*"#$**"*$K8

,  $*$ 6 *  7* <  "#" " 7** "$7$ ? ,:: 6  *A 1334 **   6 "#" < ,:: 6 "6* *! $** 7$$ <  * **  7$* ! * <  # " $** 7: *#*     "6*  76C

# '$ + , &$ # %& '%%& $ #%'$ ' &$

* -../   0

1./2/)) 3 -4  5 &67

%C **"**"C

1C :*""*?,:: "*"!7**#* "  6 "#" ",*A 1334 7 DD6* " ,$** " *$ * 7*"#"$**7:C

(C ;."#**<"AC

LC *<7$"*D**C



/(012/1334  5(/(5   0C 77*";*C03 !:#7*"<;76*:# *7$*J*""$"(3@"9*:*77 ##"$"$ A:$"$"!-MGNM:<4!433L   !*H#7C"$7*J*7D$C#$#"*= I"<H*#*<"$*"$A**7" "$<$8AIH77<#*:*#76"#" *"$8I7*D*"7$**C-#$# ** 7  * $$#* $#$$   I AI * I 5"!  A:$"$"77*#*9<; "6"$6AC#$#"#*#. " 76! < * @*!  <  "$ <$ * ;677 " <$*$H7$"$*F*C%(1!%34*%32IC    D::9= $"*=       OP Q A-

7:#"7$*J***:$H7*!?,:: "*" ?-!*?,::7D::





/(012/1334