Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/213/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/213/2006 Généré par l'IA

Notice of Appeal Timeliness Following Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment

Numéro de cause ATAS/213/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute arose from a challenge to the application of a procedural rule concerning the timeliness of a filing, specifically whether a notice of appeal was timely filed following a decision on a motion to alter or amend judgment. The court reasoned that under the relevant rules, the filing of a timely motion to alter or amend judgment tolls the time for filing a notice of appeal until the court resolves that motion, and because the appeal was filed shortly after the disposition of the motion, it was deemed timely, thereby establishing jurisdiction to hear the merits of the case.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Notice of Appeal Timeliness Following Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment: The court reasoned that under the relevant rules, the filing of a timely motion to alter or amend judgment tolls the time for filing a notice of appeal until the court resolves that motion, and because the appeal was filed shortly after the disposition of the motion, it was deemed timely, thereby establishing jurisdiction to hear the merits of the case.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
respect du délai de recours règles procédurales révision d'une décision exceptions procédurales tardives modification de la demande qualité pour recourir

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Costs are imposed on the appellant for the federal court proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
A/4019/2005
Untimely Appeal Following Partial Judgment
A/3151/2007
Appeal Timeliness Based on Judgment Entry Date
A/4332/2005
Appeal Deadline Calculation Following Untimely Motion Ruling
A/1755/2007
Appellant v. Opponent on Timeliness and Standing of Opposition
PS/33/2024
Appeal Timeliness and Fault in Late Filing

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Costs are imposed on the appellant for the federal court proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               !"#$!%&&$ !%#"!%&&$

''

( '(   ('   

) * $ $  %&&$ 



 !!!!!!!!!! "

"

# $   $$  $$ %&'( )*% "'. +"%),,, $  - #  

                 

   2*/02  

(  !!!!!!!!!!()34'5*,,3(. 5" (6

  "'   4'5 *,,3 +  5 " (   (   7 8# $   $$  $ $  '' 59" (  '+."%""(8++"7(.'+"(+'(34'5*,,36

   ( 8. 7 8# $   $$  $ $  ( - 94 *,,1 8:'";8."""9(8"""((."8++"6

   ( *1 94 *,,1 ( 8. (.  5 " (    +<" ( :" ;87  9 # $   $$  $ $  84""9+(((.6

.+(8"'.(),:.4*,,1"7845".((=  ;8 (. 4" .". (  (" ( > :.4 *,,1% ; .""  +"5(8++"6

""((";8" 31(:.(.+"<..(("(   ( 1 "5 *,,, ? @%  (.  ++" "  ";4(8++"8"+4""9""7? )@6

+"A":'.;8%'<.('((8"..% (+((.((.++"? *@6

88+=%8"'.(>:.4*,,1(.%;"+"5 (8++"6

+(.(9"(..59" 



/0)1/*,,1  20/02  

'  +  '(   ('   



,-./.   0  1.. .  23 #$% 4

  /. 

) .456

 /.

* (.59"6

0 B(C6

D :'  +" (  ;E +4" :'  "  +." A" (  (. ( 0, 9 (=  ":" + + ''(. (.  5 :.(. ( % $&FG&:; 1% 1,,D   %  " H'+   (.  +" A" +<.   '.' ("I @ (; H"'";(."(.5""+((. "";.6 5@ H+ + ; '":  "' +4 ('( "" " (.6 @ +"  <"   (  +.""  $  '.'  "" +  " ..'" .'..  "" @ 5@ " @ 2(%  5:.(.(++"'"=;E (4(.45 '.'('"'B ( +4% ; " 9"%  ;  (. "";. " E4++ ( ;.".H+.(."?" )0*%),1"),>@   <::=  .("   B$ . 

+:'(+."A""":.H+";E7E:::.(. (".+5;+<::





/0)1/*,,1