Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/207/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/207/2006 Généré par l'IA

Possessor Liability for Independent Contractor Damage Under Statute

Numéro de cause ATAS/207/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court addressed a dispute concerning the interpretation of a statute regarding liability for damage caused by specific equipment used on the premises. The central issue was whether the statute, which imposed liability on a possessor for damages arising from a dangerous condition created by the equipment, applied when the equipment was used by an independent contractor for the possessor's benefit. The court reasoned that the legislative intent of the statute was to hold the possessor strictly accountable for injuries resulting from inherently dangerous instrumentalities under their control, irrespective of whether the direct cause was the possessor's own negligence or the actions of a contracted party, thereby upholding the judgment that the possessor was liable.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Possessor Liability for Independent Contractor Damage Under Statute: The central issue was whether the statute, which imposed liability on a possessor for damages arising from a dangerous condition created by the equipment, applied when the equipment was used by an independent contractor for the possessor's benefit. The court reasoned that the legislative intent of the statute was to hold the possessor strictly accountable for injuries resulting from inherently dangerous instrumentalities under their control, irrespective of whether the direct cause was the possessor's own negligence or the actions of a contracted party, thereby upholding the judgment that the possessor was liable.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
responsabilité de l'entrepreneur possesseur action en indemnité interprétation du contrat collaborateur libre responsabilité objective simple

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision governs the allocation of court costs and was cited in the dispositive.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

                !"!#$$! #$%#$$&



' (') )*)  ')  * (

+,- !

 " , #$$& 



  !

!

"   #$%&#'()!*+,'-!./0,'#/## !12    ##



            

   */34*  

  . / -(2(#45/$$.'(6!71(  "2(2! ( !- 1( 8*-9  :  72 ;    6! ( ! 71 2!!5 -  7!   &' )  !   -  -2( !2 ;  !2)'1!7<6!2262!!!!<(6!!(2= '!-<2!(6>

6!226-712--!;!!(2>

6(1(2#%-!1?/$$.(2!((2-2!2>

11<2//-!1?/$$.<61!!(2( #45/$$.>

6!22712!!!(2#!?/$$.!; 6! ( ! 71 -  7! -2!2 (- 725 /$$/' (! ; <5!112@!5!2!5)>

6!12;65?!2(>

  0 / 6!&4, (!71(#1 #++% 8 ":'  (2  --! !  ! <  5 ( 6--!6!-5!!=!!;>

6 5! ( 6!& ./ & # (   72(2   -! A22 ( (! (   ( % !? /$$$ 8 :' < 6--< - A - !!<6!-@-21!2A2- "5!(6!&B. "'5( 6--! ! 5! ! !!  (2 ( 6' ; 6@-! ( (2(6(1!(-2(>

6 6-9' ! !!<2(2(//-!1?/$$.(6!12 <6-2!2(--!'(!<(5!(2=;-1!7 C!(225?>

--'--!!!2!!(<!!(26!=!!; --!;>

62!277!-;!((1(((2!(!( #%-!1?/$$.>

 6!12  1!' - (2 ( // -!1? /$$. (! ! '  (2(#45/$$.'C!!21!9(1(((2!>

6-!!C!-2(2;(2!(1((D77>



34.#.3/$$.  *434*   DD!!!7-!(7<((2(2-((? --2!'(9<6DE-(!;(2!8F ) ' )* F11!'/$$4'!&.4G&//:>

DD!-1!9(1(((2!'(2 E!5-!-C!!!28F ) '-&!&'!&.4G&/,:>





  *(1  (') )*)  ')  * (



230.0,, 4  500 0  67 "&# *8

#& 25?&

/& !<-2(!A!!&  A779  =A         HI J E                

-71(-2!C!!!72@-!-A77





34.#.3/$$.