Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/197/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/197/2005 Généré par l'IA

Validity of Document Despite Flawed Attestation Clause

Numéro de cause ATAS/197/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerns a challenge to the validity of a document based on defects in its execution, specifically alleging that the attestation clause failed to establish that the requisite number of witnesses signed in the presence of the testator and each other. The court reasoned that while the attestation clause contained several inconsistencies and omissions regarding the proper formalities, the testimony provided by the subscribing witnesses was sufficient to establish that all statutory requirements for valid execution were met, thereby upholding the finding of validity despite the faulty attestation clause.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Validity of Document Despite Flawed Attestation Clause: The court reasoned that while the attestation clause contained several inconsistencies and omissions regarding the proper formalities, the testimony provided by the subscribing witnesses was sufficient to establish that all statutory requirements for valid execution were met, thereby upholding the finding of validity despite the faulty attestation clause.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
documents valables arrêts en appréciation de validité condition légale degré de la preuve dépositions contradictoires attestation et certification

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

     

    "#$$$"%&&& "#'("%&&)



 *+ **+  * +

! #(  %&&)

,-  . 

  

 */++ 0* 1++  11*  + /*  *  *    !"#$ %&'% ()* + 

,#

2! 34444444444 +" ,+-# - . ! ! $ . /   ),#  0 #   1 " 2"# ,+"" 23  # --2     4444444444 

                 ! $ &45$

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

2   2 10C #+  0#* &G * %   ," #, :),"   ,#", 3+""  % + %F 8 A9  ) ,+" @ ,#">#",  -,"#  )  ,#", 3+"" #  +H+ 1 " 1" #  >    ,#"#", -"#" ,  ," 32 2  0$)"" # )")#  &' 2+> %5F 8 !9 =  , 0#* ;' * ;  A 0+-,B 1" "##",+# , - 2:": :) )",  -"-#", #  ""  ,++: @  " 0,#", 3+"" # #   2- =  ## "-,"#", -2),"# - " 0--"#", - ,:"  0#* ?&  ! 1" (:  -,>""#2  +-,B -,  ,++: 2 C "  ,+-#", =   -,>""#2  ,:   ,"2#2 -,  ,#"#", -"#" !   # -,  ,#">#", 0,#", 3+"" # ( , 2:2  +"( " #"1 =

4%5554&'''

$ ;45$

0 ,21 " B  "  #J  "#":  +#"( 0,#", 3+""   +H+ +"( 10 +#"(  ,#"#", ! =   ,#   -2#  # , "2 @ "  "#":  +#"( 0 ! =

4%5554&'''

$ 545$

  / + *+ **+  * +

!

78252   9  :22 2  0; #<% +=>

  52 

%* 2  +   +")2 )> =

! 52

&* ,  @  "  )2  0,--,"#", 3,+2 - .," DDDDDDDDDD  +#"(  ,#">#",  2:"+  ,#", 3+"" = ;* 2>,#  -#"  #,# # ,", = 5* "# 1  -,2  # :#"#*

 :33"( K  2" # K

" AA /" ! /

 ,-" ,3,+  -2# H# # ,#"3"2 C -#" -  :33 

4%5554&'''