Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/162/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/162/2007 Généré par l'IA

Deed Notarization Validity in Real Estate Transfer

Numéro de cause ATAS/162/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party brought suit alleging breach of contract and fraud related to a real estate transaction, specifically contesting the validity of a deed executed under a power of attorney, asserting the document was not properly notarized as required by statute for an instrument transferring interest in land. The court held that a defectively notarized deed is not void but merely voidable, and that the failure to strictly comply with the statutory requirement for notarization only rendered the deed invalid as a conveyance against persons protected by the recording statute, not as between the original parties or their successors who had actual notice.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Deed Notarization Validity in Real Estate Transfer: The court held that a defectively notarized deed is not void but merely voidable, and that the failure to strictly comply with the statutory requirement for notarization only rendered the deed invalid as a conveyance against persons protected by the recording statute, not as between the original parties or their successors who had actual notice.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
transaction immobilière validité du contrat procuration acte de cautionnement escroquerie fortune immobilière
Généré par l'IA
C/9691/2018
Seller v. Notary for Professional Liability Regarding Void Real Estate Sale Due to Defective Deed Formalization
C/6572/2012
Real Estate Sales Contract Void Due to Missing Essential Conditions in Authentic Deed
A/3309/2005
Contract Validity and Statute of Frauds: Property Description Sufficiency
A/2588/2004
Validity of Prior Sales Agreements Regarding Real Estate
A/2919/2007
Property Transfer Validity Dispute

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



               #$#%&&' #()%#%&&'



* +*   *   

,-.  ( " %& /0  %&&'         !"""#$  %    '!'( !&'()#("!!""*#(+('    , (!"    !('    --     * ..    "' "("# /!01$      

             !"

   %424%  

"  / 1" &' #""!  46 !)7' 4558  *--       * ..  %   9"%&':  ;  '!  '!"(     #  <081  $  '( (":' *")""(# $ !&('  <' #7'4553 !'("'(!&#("'&!'#&!=(>(?

 *  *( >!# '  ')  !/ #('"(  34*4@5 >'A  ( &&"B#*#C'(30?

 *'#  '&'#(# &' +(' (!"   ,   "('D(# '!'  3D)"' 4551 !(' "( #""!? B* !((  7     '(? B*  ">!'# *  B* "(  &' !''"' #&'#  E D!'  $  "!&("!>##'("!('&'"'!9- %  ;" !"B'#("##(/(#(#&'"!&(?

4>#)'"'4551 #'#'("''!'!'?



     1" '!'#(#'("'#?

F"!)"(F&''(('/''G?

   2  +*   *   

"

34 / -- 5  6        7 8 ()% !9

<A '('('"('!'A

4A /'GA  H'>>":'I  '#"(I     '"%!"  J !'"K    

!&"!>!'&'#(''E((!(">"#=&'("&'H'>>





2324551