Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/1406/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/1406/2007 Généré par l'IA

Contractual Interpretation Dispute Regarding Liability Limitation

Numéro de cause ATAS/1406/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerns a dispute over contractual provisions, specifically regarding the scope and application of certain clauses, including one related to compensation or liability limitation. The court analyzed the language of the relevant agreements, focusing on the intent of the parties as expressed in the written terms and the context surrounding their execution. The reasoning centered on interpreting the ambiguous terms against the drafter and applying established principles of contract construction, ultimately concluding that the challenged provision did not apply to the specific circumstances presented, thereby affirming or reversing the lower court's determination regarding the parties' respective obligations.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Contractual Interpretation Dispute Regarding Liability Limitation: The court analyzed the language of the relevant agreements, focusing on the intent of the parties as expressed in the written terms and the context surrounding their execution. The reasoning centered on interpreting the ambiguous terms against the drafter and applying established principles of contract construction, ultimately concluding that the challenged provision did not apply to the specific circumstances presented, thereby affirming or reversing the lower court's determination regarding the parties' respective obligations.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
interprétation du contrat responsabilité de l'entrepreneur domaine de la loi du contrat clause pénale compétence en matière de contrats conclus par les consommateurs partie au contrat

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article is cited in the dispositive concerning the allocation of procedural costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



           #$$%%#&''( )#*+'%#&''(

,,)

- ),.- )  -, .

/ +  0 1/ &''( 



 !

 

!

""   "  "  # ! ( ! $%&'# 

          !"   

   /,)*/  

))-  2.)

 ""   "  "  0/12  3 (11!,45!,--.#

! 0/12!3!!6!( .1! 7,--.!!!(#

  ! (1481! 7,--.#

9 !4,!7,--.#!!!  7 ! !!!!9::!!12  1!" ;<$1 (4=+4>4=+&?

9 @   12# 9! ( A @ @B( ! C > 9::  1(!!#! ""  ;D E"  "  #: A9@(:! : 1!@!?

 1   ,* @ 7 ,--.#    :   7 A !  @ ! 1  !  12 $!(#  ! >  A   ! 1! ! !A!@B(1@1?

9 !  *- @ 7 ,--.#  !  ! (( !:! 1 !! 11!?

.,)  ,.)

 : ( ! > 9!F &+ F 4 !F  $F4    G@  9G! 603# 7!H!!A !!!1(@>I!&+:((1!G((!     + !7 ,--- 0 3# !@ >   :((  I/@!@@!,-( 74='+0 "3?

 1(!16GI12!(!7?

9!6!((!: 1(@1#!@70!F&+! +- 3?

 ! >  !!  *- @ 7 ,--. ( 1  !#  @! 9 !! 1! !   !  @B   >    1 @ ?





)++),--.  /*)*/  

,  ").2  ),.- )  -, .

 

  3

4F (@7F

 3

,F 9 !1! !F

*F (11!,45!,--.!@> ""   "  "  1@F

'F !A1(!G!!F

&F :   1!   AI 1@! :   !  1(! %!   (  *- 6 2  !:! 12  7 :(( 0"$JK$:A+#+--'  3#1@ !2! 17#: ( !C!F8,:(( 7:((4. 6 ,--& 0 L3?  (    ! A  # !: ! B1@!1!G!! !?! %! (  7 :(( 1 @ 1!  1 @ (!A C !  9!F ',  LF  1(! %! !  12  1  !#@A(  B1@#@!%!6!>9@F  G::2  1(!         "B@ E M  

1: 1(!%!!!:(C1!AI>I:::(( 1G::



)++),--.