Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/1366/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/1366/2007 Généré par l'IA

Statutory Interpretation and Cost Recovery in Financial Regulation Challenge

Numéro de cause ATAS/1366/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerned a dispute over the application of certain statutory provisions regarding the recovery of costs and the scope of preclusion based on prior administrative determinations, specifically involving challenges to agency findings related to the regulation of certain financial activities. The court reasoned that the challenged administrative findings were subject to judicial review because the plaintiff asserted that the agency misinterpreted the controlling statute, and that the requested relief did not impermissibly seek to overturn factual determinations that were already subject to statutory preclusive effect; furthermore, the court concluded that the applicable cost recovery provisions did not bar the plaintiff from recovering costs under a general statute, as the specific statutory scheme did not contain an explicit waiver of such general cost recovery rights.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Statutory Interpretation and Cost Recovery in Financial Regulation Challenge: The court reasoned that the challenged administrative findings were subject to judicial review because the plaintiff asserted that the agency misinterpreted the controlling statute, and that the requested relief did not impermissibly seek to overturn factual determinations that were already subject to statutory preclusive effect; furthermore, the court concluded that the applicable cost recovery provisions did not bar the plaintiff from recovering costs under a general statute, as the specific statutory scheme did not contain an explicit waiver of such general cost recovery rights.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
recouvrement des frais prétention légale règlement financier dispositions financières contrôle juridictionnel frais administratifs

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Applied for the allocation of court costs against the appellant.
Généré par l'IA
A/805/2005
Statutory Interpretation of Fund Recovery Prerequisites
A/180/2007
Statutory Interpretation of Mandatory Cost Provisions Following Procedural Developments
A/4266/2006
Statutory Interpretation of Fees and Costs Liability Post-Dismissal
A/3951/2005
Fee and Expense Calculation Dispute
A/1289/2004
Statutory Amendment Retroactivity and Vested Rights in Cost Recovery

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied for the allocation of court costs against the appellant.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



           !"#$$!%&&# !'"((!%&&#

))

*+ ),-+      * +)  , 

./  "

 %$ /  %&&# 



 



      ! " +, #$%&"'(()*" 

                 

   /(-%/  

*+  0 ,

$,,0,#1#,/##1#+'2# #34+5 6 #78(&&%*7+(&&9:

'#,#7(0,8(&&."#34+5',' # # ; 1#+, # %< =  +0 > 1, 8  #, # 0 0+,#1$#?+##+,#34+5#,' ',##18,:

'#,''#<'+$(&&."#34+50+, #,#7(0,8(&&.:

#,,,0,;1,##@'+$(&&.:

' #)$(&&."1,=, '2# $# ,:

18,;1A'>#8,#"1,#+8A',#, 8=##A'>,>#,+$,'" # #1,# ; B ,,+ C, # DE #" AF++ +'',#B:

 *),

" 0+,+;1G<9G7G3G@#5815 =#HI" $#J> #',8;K<9#0,#,'5,,## #   # 9 $ (&&& H I 8 ;   0,#,  K/34+5$5K#+,#K8$,#(<=7)@(:

+','=5##K'2,$:

 KG 9& #   0,#, # 9 $ (&&&   ' 5,, # # #   H I ',8  #, #  #  = #2  0##,>,:

K9&G( "G*@;%7''$'5:

  #," +', ' =  ' +" ++ ;   #+ #  ++HG*@G7 I:

 >  #, ,3  +#"  #+3   = 0,, #  L  '',#+25"+','+ =8$>HG*@G* I:



-*.))-(&&.  /*-%/     , #8 F +  ' #  # = # #, ; K, #  " ;  #" ;  '   ;  ', #'+>  HG*)G7 I:

K8#KG%&G7 "#,,5'F'5,:

K00",,##A5>H+I ''F+'','#+'M>K++ A'$,#"#+2>'38# > K >  K$= #  ',#  #,08+ ,  0 H "#+0"8G("7))7"'G7@7I:

K##,''#F#,"#+2A'"; #>>,+#,,+'F3,"0"#K5# #,0A,HG%7G7 I'>K#+##+8," #>   # K+'F3+"  ',, #  #A = ; +' # L,:

K K5 ; # #' +',8 A>   ' F #,5, H'# # , #+8 #  0,#, D E 9&-7))9" #G<G%"'G*9.: N77)@.#G(: N77((<9#G(I:

KK'2"#,#++,;#+#0" )'+$(&&.>K#8;,3,@$(&&.:

K,,#,',500# $#,>K##7&$ (&&.:

K#8#8+:

  +0 #  # #, 8>, '  "   ' #  #"F#,,+++'F3+8$#:

 $#,K#K3A>##,8$' ##8,G







-*.))-(&&.  /%-%/  

 )  1 ,0  ),-+      * +)  , 



 2 /

7G ,8$'##8,G

(G >',#5G

*G 0+  ' #  >K '8 0+    ', F #  #, # *& = #2  0 '2 # $ 0,#, H 3OP30>9"9&&%  I"'8#+2## '$"0+,+AG@(#0,#, $0,#,#7. = (&&< H NI:  +,+ #  # #>  " +0  +Q#'8'5##+#:# F #,  $ 0,#, ' 8 '  ' 8 ,> A # # 1G %(  NG  ', F   '2  ' # "8>,+++Q#'8"#8F=;18G   5002  ',#         NN R  R



 ' 0+ # ', F  0, A '  >K , #1;1,+'500



-*.))-(&&.