Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/1322/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/1322/2007 Généré par l'IA

Extension Denial for New Trial Motion Based on Witness Credibility Overturned

Numéro de cause ATAS/1322/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A lower court improperly denied a request for an extension of time to file a motion for a new trial, which was based on newly discovered evidence regarding the credibility of a key witness, because the court failed to properly assess the materiality of the evidence and the diligence of the party seeking the extension. The reviewing court found that the trial court's denial was an abuse of discretion as the evidence, which contradicted the witness's testimony on a crucial point, could have affected the outcome, and the party was not entirely at fault for the delay in discovery, thus warranting the allowance of the motion to extend the filing deadline.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Extension Denial for New Trial Motion Based on Witness Credibility Overturned: The reviewing court found that the trial court's denial was an abuse of discretion as the evidence, which contradicted the witness's testimony on a crucial point, could have affected the outcome, and the party was not entirely at fault for the delay in discovery, thus warranting the allowance of the motion to extend the filing deadline.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
crédibilité des témoins faits et preuves nouveaux extension de la procédure moyens de preuve tardifs droit de refuser de témoigner moment du dépôt

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The decision orders the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
A/2477/2005
Appeal of Denial of Motion for New Trial Based on Evidentiary Sufficiency and Jury Instructions
C/11866/2008
Appeal Regarding Refusal to Extend Reply Brief Deadline and Admit New Evidence in Fraud Case
C/6979/2015
Appeal Regarding Denial of Extension for Written Response and Evidentiary Hearing Timing
A/1744/2004
Procedural Discretion in Denying New Trial Motion
C/11867/2008
Appellant's Denial of Extension to File Reply Brief Based on Delayed Evidence Access

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The decision orders the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



           '()*+'),,- "'.())'),,-

"

 " "#    # 

/0 + ! ). 1/0 ),,- 



   !



 !

""   #$%&'&&( &!&+ &))&%* 



           ! "# $%  &! !

   ).,.)  

  +&&   33 &!&   .* '&! .112  #44& !   #3 &  4&!+&& .5.1123(&&+6   &!73!!& ! #&3&!+389!%&95: .112;

 .< =!.112#+ !!!+&& 3( ! 6 !& &&(#6# ! &3!!& ! &;

3+%&.*3!>.112#&!&+ !'! ;

  +3      50 ! > .112 7 (!&  3 + 3  &>+;

+&& / %>.112#&!&+3(& &9+&&   !! ?

  #"$  " "#    # 

5? !+&& 3#&!&+/ %>.112?

.? !!( !% >'!?

-? 4   3!&   (@ 3%! 4     !  3+! A!   +&  -1 '  9   !&4&!&  39  &> 4++ B$CD&EC 4(&**11:  F3% & !&9 &! 3>& 4 +!7!?/. &4++ &>4++52 '& .110 B "F;  + &     &! &&(   &   !&4 !  G3%!3 !&8! !  !&;& &! A! +  &> 4++ 3 % & 3 !  3 % & +! &( 7  &!&   #!? :.  "?  3+! A! !  3&9  3 &    !&% (+  G3% &%!A!' &!6#% &?    844&9H +&!H       & I  $ G  

 3& 4 3+!A!! !&4&+73!&3844



,-./0,.112