Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/1261/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/1261/2007 Généré par l'IA

Arbitration Award Enforcement Despite Alleged Arbitrator Overreach

Numéro de cause ATAS/1261/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party challenged the legal validity of an arbitration award, arguing that the arbitrator exceeded their authority by addressing matters not submitted for arbitration and that the award was based on an erroneous interpretation of the governing agreement, asserting that the arbitrator acted outside the scope of their delegated power concerning certain claims. The court held that the arbitrator's interpretation, even if arguably erroneous on matters clearly within the scope of submission, must be affirmed unless the award was entirely unfounded or demonstrated manifest disregard for controlling law, concluding that the submission clearly encompassed the disputed issues and the resulting award was therefore enforceable as a matter of contract interpretation, not judicial review of the merits.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Arbitration Award Enforcement Despite Alleged Arbitrator Overreach: The court held that the arbitrator's interpretation, even if arguably erroneous on matters clearly within the scope of submission, must be affirmed unless the award was entirely unfounded or demonstrated manifest disregard for controlling law, concluding that the submission clearly encompassed the disputed issues and the resulting award was therefore enforceable as a matter of contract interpretation, not judicial review of the merits.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
arbitrage exécution validité du contrat créance contestée arbitrabilité pouvoir d'examen

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



           ()*+,(,++* #(-,.-(,++*

#

 #$ #     $

"/0  - ' -)  /0  ,++*           ! %%' "#$" %&%!'!&%  (    ( %!)*    '%    ++     , (( -      % ' ! )./ 

       !  "  #$#% ! &' ' 

   -#01-  

'  1 2' &% !    #. 2' #$$/ ,++     , (( -   3 -&%4 5&%!&&%  - %''%)!& 6 #$$"7 ' 89,% ' & '!'%: ' 4%' : '!&'!;

 , '!%! %&%!'! &%    (    (  % * '%6'!%%'% '!  1'<%#$$/;

 &% %% %  # :<% #$$/ ,   '%   % <  ! &  ,!  %=6%''%&>'#.2'#$$/;9,  88'! !%&%%, '%'  % '%' 7, 9  %%:!  6''7%%;



     98%!'7,%'?@A?"'?B?# % < '% C' ' 9''' &%!:7 D%' @A 9 '%' :7 %D%- :  '!".6 ".@.;

&!'&%6E%D&4'  !'< ;

    &' %9D '' %  <  !!'  %% 9  !  ''9!'%%!''&%'  8 %&'%69D7D:  %!&%%3%'?@1?1 5;

  :!   '='% ' 8 !%%''&%'!7  D'% '!%%38? F#$". % %%'' G5;

D'8  ' E9%H%%&G  %%';

'',&4;

%%: '4%<6';

DG '%D%'? I@?#'?8 %D%-:   '%: :' 3 (5&& <&%E 3%'?A. 5%%'9 <' 'E  % '  %<%'   8%  ' !&    9  G   ' %   %8 G!&%6E'= D'&G&%!' 8%! 3 + "%%"..$ ??5;

  %%'  % '  %<%'  !&  :%'   !E '  8!!% = %9  &%!% '  <6' &% '' 9  B  4  &%4  6' 8 ' 3 + ""$  @/  ? #;   ".I. &? 1"I  ?#<5;



01/$#0#$$/  -101-   ''D&44%9%%'<'9 '&'!  ;

,,&4!&%'8 G!7I$$8%?;





  3#$4  #$ #     $

'

"? ''9%%':<6'?

#? )%J?

1?  D ' ! 7 :%% 7  %%'    I$$ 8%? 7 ' '%  &%'  &' 78% '!&?

K? 7&%: %!'?   E%88 4%  %! '     % -  L % M 

& 8%&%!'%%=''' 8 !G&%'   9D7D88 8!!% % &%E%88



01/$#0#$$/