Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/125/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/125/2004 Généré par l'IA

Appeal of Denial to Compel Arbitration Based on Unenforceable Class Action Waiver

Numéro de cause ATAS/125/2004
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appeal concerned the denial of a motion to compel arbitration, where the lower court found the arbitration clause unenforceable due to issues with mutual assent regarding a class action waiver within the agreement. The appellate court reasoned that while the party seeking to enforce the agreement had presented sufficient evidence of a contract formation, the evidence regarding the specific inclusion and understanding of the class action waiver was lacking, and the specific contractual language did not clearly and unambiguously demonstrate that the parties mutually agreed to waive their right to pursue class or collective remedies through arbitration, thus affirming the lower court's denial of the motion to compel arbitration on those specific terms.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Appeal of Denial to Compel Arbitration Based on Unenforceable Class Action Waiver: The appellate court reasoned that while the party seeking to enforce the agreement had presented sufficient evidence of a contract formation, the evidence regarding the specific inclusion and understanding of the class action waiver was lacking, and the specific contractual language did not clearly and unambiguously demonstrate that the parties mutually agreed to waive their right to pursue class or collective remedies through arbitration, thus affirming the lower court's denial of the motion to compel arbitration on those specific terms.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
convention d'arbitrage action collective renonciation au droit convention collective clause contractuelle droit de manifester

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Costs were ordered against the appellant based on this provision.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

     

    %&'()%*++& ,%&*(%*++'

-,

" , " .,#  ". #. 

 &+  *++'

'/  .0 !

  

 1111111111    !"  #  $  % %& ' ()*+ ,-  . % %/ # # %&0## &

& 

#22 . .,#  3".4 5  ,  % 1& '2 ()(( ,- (3

# #0

          ! "#  $

4 )534

 2 ,

(7   6 /  %##& % (2  08 )( 9::#  & % 94#-#%#  ;#4, 9 <  & &1 = !&# >>>>>>>>>>     #, %.#-#%#  % ( ?# (''+  3( %08 (''2 #  / %   =  # % ( 0 )( @

)7   &# % (( & &8 )( .  & &   %##& & = .& &# %. %0#4  %9#-#%#  =  # % ( 0 )( @

37  %  % 0# #& % )+ :-# )) 9   & =  :&0 #& # ? && % #0  / %   & &1  & =  # % ( 0 )( @

67   &# % (A ?-# )6 9  %  # & & @

(7 .   /  ( &B )3      0# %9&::#  #8  & %  &# /#  %, & &0   &:&00 = 9 7 3 7 3 %  &# % (6 &-08 )) @

)7   &  %  &# % (A ?-# )6 /9#  ## & & @

37 9# &-# %9 %    % 1   % C @

5(6+25)(

4 3534

 . #, 2  , " .,#  ". #. 

 786   9  :   ;< &=* # >

 6

(7 %   %  # % & @

)7 1   % C7

 D::# E  #%  E

F#%   !  #  

  #4?#  E G%#/  $ 

 &# &:&0 %  H  & #:# I  # ## /9= 9::# :% %  &#   D::

5(6+25)(