Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/1212/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/1212/2007 Généré par l'IA

Contractual Quality Dispute and Extrinsic Evidence Admissibility

Numéro de cause ATAS/1212/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellant sought to recover damages for breach of contract, claiming that the appellee failed to deliver materials of the agreed-upon quality, leading to losses in construction projects. The court reasoned that the contractual specification regarding material quality was ambiguous as written, and the trial court did not err in admitting extrinsic evidence to determine the parties' intent regarding the standard of quality; furthermore, the court found sufficient evidence to support the trial court's determination that the delivered materials did not conform to the contractually intended standard, thus upholding the finding of breach and the resulting damages award.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, Art. 64 LTF; Contractual Quality Dispute and Extrinsic Evidence Admissibility: The court reasoned that the contractual specification regarding material quality was ambiguous as written, and the trial court did not err in admitting extrinsic evidence to determine the parties' intent regarding the standard of quality; furthermore, the court found sufficient evidence to support the trial court's determination that the delivered materials did not conform to the contractually intended standard, thus upholding the finding of breach and the resulting damages award.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
dommages-intérêts contractuels contrat de construction manquement au devoir preuve libératoire garantie en raison des défauts de la chose nature de l'infraction

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Costs are imposed on the appellant who lost the appeal.
Art. 64 LTF
Legal aid is granted to the appellant because their claims were not entirely without merit.
Généré par l'IA
A/1823/2004
Contract Breach Appeal Regarding Goods Delivery and Parol Evidence Admission
A/2301/2006
Contract Breach and Damages Dispute
A/2084/2007
Contract Breach and Damages Award
A/925/2005
Breach of Warranty in Construction Contract Based on Extrinsic Evidence
A/99/2005
Contractual Damages Causation Dispute

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Costs are imposed on the appellant who lost the appeal.

Art. 64 LTF

Legal aid is granted to the appellant because their claims were not entirely without merit.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



           %&'()%'( +%,','%'(

 +

 +  +       

-  '

# ) ./-  '( 

    !"#$%  & '

 '   !"#"( )



*'

++ , ++&  !8' -++ '+ *,./0*1#/% "#"" ""

-    +    +    *'*  0* 2'030*%4##56 7



               ! "#   # $

  #9:  

 0 +

"; '<3*(4 #44/(=>2' ' 20' =' * 0'!   ?'    !  "$/( *  ' !"$/"' !*. "$$:;

#; +> 88'%<3*0'! *! ' 20' =' *'!  0'*3 0'  * !  ? '  0'!?@ 0'8  A  0'  B, !0B'*' 3;

(;  <3*   ?' * ? !8  * 8  "/ C* #44/ *  !*! *'  D88  ' 2!#$C*#44/0'B!* 0'*3;

:;  ' 2  !  *'0!  !0B 0   * **  !8' '!   0' *     A'  **  ? '   'A '*' 3 **'. "$$:*"/C*#44/;

1; +  '' '   ++  , ++  &  -++   #1 0*2' #44/  0'**  A  0*  ' 3 0'  ' *  ((D($1 8';:4 *!'E* 0'  * 0'  0'** A  2'03A 0'=+F++-G' !* * !<H 88  ! H  ' 3    * '; '  '  * ''*    0'!'A'D? *< * !;

.;  * * !*! *'  B 0'*   ' D *'* ;  <'  *  '   A! 0' 0   ## *2' #44/ ADH !8* D2'?*  D    1 ?2' #44/  ''E* ' * ' '  2;   !3* 8'!  ' AD ? * ?' '  0*   2' 03 * *''  '!E! 8*A 0*' *?'*H 0'=-*  * ** 00!* ?H5I' >;

/; D2D2<* ! 8 B!!*!3'!H<3';

  +

"; D'*;#1 8!!'' 2'030'!?@0'8  ?  '? ?** ?  *!"/!2'"$$(J-K*'!? 3' "'<? '#444'=30'!' ?';'A< ** 0L''0'** '* H0'*3'J'*;"##*"#(  ? , K <3  ?'0!**D'*;/(;" 8!!'' 0'!?@ 0'8   #1 <  "$%# JK  * H =?  ' 2 *' 0 "'C*#44( *0'=AD88 ' 

    9(#/.9#44/ (9:  

 !*!*' J'*;":# KB!*'D88 0'*3'2 ! '!0'* * !*' !0'<3 ?';

#; +D'*;##-J?*'? 3'0 "'<? '#444K   ?'  0'**   '*  A  '*  ' 3 * 0'*3! 8'!* B'*;"##"#(":"*":# M'*;(H1 -D00 A* 0'3 **H*'8!''J;"K;'>A< *0'**  '* H0'*3'''0H 88!'*'0'** '* 3*!  ? '   2' 03 B ** !?**  *   ?' *  0'** '* 3*!? ' 2'03B **!?** * ' 3J8;'*;#:-K;'<* H  0'**   '*  * H D? '   2' 03 B **  *      ' 3  *!'E*   *   ?' J - "#%  #(4M -"#$:::K;

 L0=  <3  0' =' *  '!  0'*3 0'  * !  0'**   '*  A  '*  ' 3 0'  ';  * 0'* **L0'*' 3. "$$:L*'0'*"/C* #44/*HA<3* ?'*?B!* ';

(; +  * 0' *  0'**  A  0*  ' 3 0'  '*((D($18';:4 *!'E*0' ;  ' *HB, !0**".D.$/8';/4J((D($18';:4N#K;

:; 8'!* H  <' 0' 0   <' !*' * 0'  0'*3 <AD**'8'*0'** '* '< *  ?'!2!!8   '0'** ' *H *!'E*0* '' **, ;  *!'E**!*B  !3D'*;"# D''0'!?@0'8 ?  '? ?** ?  *!  "% ?'  "$%: J #K    *B '!3* '    ,  * 0!' ' J -"#$#11 ;(K;

1;  !*  ' 0'O  0'!' !** 3'* * J'*; /( ; #  * %$7;" '0'!'  *'* ?"#0*2'"$%1K;



PPP



    9(#/.9#44/ :9:  

   + 0  +  +       

"; ? *  ++  , +  &  -++  H *'8!''  0*   '   ".D.$/8';/4H-    +    +  8?'   A *!'E*0* '  !'*=<AD**'8'*;

#; H?''H8';'0*H?' '8?' 0'= -* * ** 00!* ?;

(; L@**A2 ;

:;  *A0'!'*3'* *;

1; 8'  0'*    AL 0?* 8'' '' *'  0'!* ''E*   !   (4 <' =  * 8 *  0'=  ' 2 8!!' J+>Q R'>8A ..44:  K0'? ''* ='' * 02 8'!*B'*;%# 8!!'' ' 28!!'"/ <  #441 J -KM  ! '  ''  *  A'    * 8 * @0'?*0'*' 3*'''** 'M  * E*' '!  ' 2 8!!' 0' ?  0*  0' ?  !*' A B  *   D'*; :#  -;  0'!* ''E* *  0 =  0   ''* ?A!@0'? ?*E*'< *HD? ;  3'88 ='  '! *N         &S 5 2+ 

0 8'0'!*''E*** 8 !B0'*   ALHL88 8!!' ' 0'3'88

    9(#/.9#44/