Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/118/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/118/2005 Généré par l'IA

Contractual Quality Standards Breach Interpretation

Numéro de cause ATAS/118/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court considered whether a party breached a contract by failing to deliver goods meeting specific quality standards, as evidenced by contractual specifications and prior course of dealing, where the dispute centered on interpreting ambiguous contractual language regarding the required quality level. The court reasoned that the objective evidence, including the written specifications and established commercial practices between the parties, clearly demonstrated an obligation to meet a higher standard than what was delivered, thus constituting a breach despite the alleged ambiguity of one clause, and affirmed the finding of liability.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 93 LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Contractual Quality Standards Breach Interpretation: The court reasoned that the objective evidence, including the written specifications and established commercial practices between the parties, clearly demonstrated an obligation to meet a higher standard than what was delivered, thus constituting a breach despite the alleged ambiguity of one clause, and affirmed the finding of liability.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
interprétation du contrat différend commercial défaut de la chose cahier des charges manquement au devoir corps certain

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 93 LTF
Used to dismiss the appeal as inadmissible because it concerns an interlocutory decision.
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Applied to order the appellant to pay the procedural costs of the federal court.
Généré par l'IA
A/1484/2007
Breach of Contract for Sale of Goods Regarding Quality
A/2064/2005
Breach of Contract for Failure to Meet Delivery and Quality Standards
A/2936/2007
Contractual Interpretation and Breach of Supply Obligations
A/1360/2006
Contractual Interpretation and Breach Dispute
C/12841/1999
Contract Interpretation and Breach of Performance Standard Appeal

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 93 LTF

Used to dismiss the appeal as inadmissible because it concerns an interlocutory decision.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied to order the appellant to pay the procedural costs of the federal court.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               #$%&'#$%%& #(()#$%%*

!!

+ !,+ -  +! -,

 (' ./ $%%* &0  12 3 



   4444444444 





-55, -  6 -,  !"# ""!  $%&'#()((*+$



                ! "

   -),%-  

 5,

(. /0! 4444444444+" 0($0 !1)&&)$&2")&&$3"  045"""6""*7!""  8999999: .)(!")&&$# 4!;!"!0+"+<<$&2")&&$.* (=2" )&&$# 4  4   7 ><<"  0 >!" ? @   0!0 71  <""0"0!" 0AB!67%&C0*(2")&&$.

).  0 "" 0 ($ D )&&$# 4   <   0!0 04"0!"   !"< 34 +"2"<"30"5!"0"5-A"20"".

$. )=D)&&$#4 <!  !". <"+"3#0! E "00""#""!4"""74 "+ + 4   +"6 0 + 0"""  6#  " 0""" " 0 4"3  "5 !" 0 "" <<" 7 4+04!"0 "-004"0!"".

F. 0 """"0)G!1)&&$#4 <"! 0 ""0 ($ D )&&$. 4     3 "  0!0 04"0!"  +" <<"+!  0  (=2")&&$#"0"77 ! 0 (2" )&&$# " 1" 3  0" 7 4"0!"  0 0" 0 0"""  +"6 0"  0. 4  "+3 4+" 0  "

04 74 !"?: @#300 !"4""0 +0"004+00 "-004"0!""..

%. "0)$1)&&$#4 "2 0 "". "30"""16 "04"37.

G. +" 7#4 #0 +"0)F+!1)&&$#!" "".



 ,)&$',)&&$  -$,%-  

 !-,

(. "6+"46""20"""?@  !0"<" "" #0*  ( D )&&$#  "1  0  "# !  0 "3 26# 0   "0   +"- "0# "3    "H 26 ?.(.%G @.

:" 7 4" 0 4 " 0 26 #   "1 < 0   )'2+")&&F? I($&(&G@#0 "6+"0 #($< +"#  0"""""6! "10 " 0 " 6   7 " 26 ""# # 0 4 0 4 "0+526.

).  "1  0  " J#  " "3# 0 " "+ 7  " < 0   4 AB!6 1"6"  4"0!" 04"+1"" ? K.%G@.

:! 26004*"" 1".

$.  " < 0    " 6   0 0" 0  " 0 G1)&&&? @    +"6 ( 2+" )&&$# J  !0"<"" 0 !1 0"""  6 0  0!" 0  ". : 0""" 4"3 7   # < 0 6" 5 ?.(.( @.

 # "2  0  <!  0 " 3"   " ?. %G . (  G& .( @#+1.

F.  ""6   !" "   0""" "1   04*# A 3  0 "-0 04"0!""  +" 4+" 3  (2")&&$   B#  3" 4   #  3  + 0"""  !"* 0 AB!6   " !    +"6  (2")&&$.

%.  +"0  < 5"" 6  5 !"*00""! 3"3#0A6!0*600"# 6"" +"60 ""0> 0<"3"0"L " 2"0"3! 3"0 32"0"3? I()'FG'"0.(@.

G. 0>*#> 0<"2"0"3!0 !"00 00" + 7 0 "0!"  0 AB!6 >  "  * 4   +"6 0 + 0"""  6 "3# "" 3 4 <" !3 4"  ""! 72"#43(2")&&$30""

 ,)&$',)&&$  -F,%-   4+ 0 0" 5 "0!"  0 AB!6     " 0   0  #3 "0+"$&2")&&$.

'.  1  <"" 04"0!"  0 AB!6#    0" !"  0"" "+ 7   "0 0 ""   L "1   ?.M.(. @.  +04.($.( #0+"60"(2")&&$# " 3" 0  "!" 0 0 "-0  + 7  << ?.=.$  @  5  0 0H !"  !"  "+"  !" 7 "" !"  0"" "+ 7   "0 0 "".   0 4.=.$ # 

0 "-0"17 "00""!!7"05 B.46"0005   04"""04 AB!6# "4*# "00(2")&&($&2")&&$.

4 0"+"5 00 "-0"+" !"7""# >-7-0" +" A   "  3  "" 0 AB!6     + . <! ! 7 4. (( . (  )  # ! !! !" 0 "" A3 !" "+" " 0 3 4    0 ".   "00""3"4"6!""+""00"" . 2  "!"0"".

M.  4*# 0  0 "-0 0 ""# " 0 ( 2" )&&(  $&2")&&$# 4   2"<" +" +"  0 ($ 0 !1 )&&)  $&2")&&$# " 0 "5 !"  (M#) 2.    2"<" 04 !" 0H!"0""#"30"74"0!"   " .



 ,)&$',)&&$   -%,%-  

!  -,5  !,+ -  +! -,



1.   7  8   69 (:$ -

  . 

(.  +1K

 .

). 2K

$. "3 06"K

F. <!  " 0  34 + <!      L 0  0 " 0 $& 2 0*  "<""  " !!0  0   "1 < 0  0 # :AN"HA<3" G# G&&F   #  " 5!".  0 "   L 6 .  ! !" 0"O @ "0"3 5!30 ""0 "1""00 "" 3 K 1@ 5  3 !"< " "! +" 0!0  

0 ""K @   "6   0   . :"  ! !"  "   "  ! !     @ 1@  @ "-0#  "1< 0 0!"*34" 0+0 "+1.! !"0!"!; 0 +# 3"  2"# "" 3  0 "" 3   4+ 0 3  5 0" ?.($)#(&G(&M@.  6<<"*O   "0O   "II P": P       

"<!0 L"<" 5"""3474<<"< 0  0" "04 74 !"6<<



 ,)&$',)&&$