Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/1169/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/1169/2007 Généré par l'IA

Contract Termination Date and Statute of Limitations

Numéro de cause ATAS/1169/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party challenged a lower court's order dismissing its action for breach of contract, asserting that the trial court erred in concluding that the action was barred by the statute of limitations because the underlying contract had been validly terminated prior to the statutory period. The appellate court reasoned that the statute of limitations did not begin to run until the contract was unambiguously repudiated, and given the conflicting evidence regarding the purported termination, the lower court improperly resolved factual issues concerning the termination date and thus the applicability of the statute of limitations, necessitating reversal and remand for a determination of when the contract was definitively terminated.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 68 al. 3 LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Contract Termination Date and Statute of Limitations: The appellate court reasoned that the statute of limitations did not begin to run until the contract was unambiguously repudiated, and given the conflicting evidence regarding the purported termination, the lower court improperly resolved factual issues concerning the termination date and thus the applicability of the statute of limitations, necessitating reversal and remand for a determination of when the contract was definitively terminated.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
résiliation de contrat délai de prescription congé tardif péremption du délai légal partie au contrat contentieux contractuel

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 68 al. 3 LTF

Applied for the procedural decision to dismiss the appeal as inadmissible.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied for the ordering of court costs for the federal proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



            !""##!  $$%&"##!

''

() '*+), , , ( )', *

-.    " /0/.  "##! 



  !" #$# $ & !%&'"&  !("&  )&*   

&

++     ( $$ #      &!" ,-. 

                

   #2/0#  

 ,() , 1*

% " 4.5&233.(66& (#' &"&,"7    & &8 !&" 7  %"   4 9  03%&!:233;<

 %   ; %&!: 233.    &9&"  & && "&%":!&7('& (=>&&7!%  ( ?%&%%!&7(& (&&8!&" &!%<

@' A!&""% " 44&:233.@ " " 4.5&233.& " " % (&& <

,*(', , ('*

 4B'!:2332! 6&A'@A&9  CD&"'A45&2330&&" :&   &&&  & = &!!&   &&& &' 7   6" "  @#' &" C < 6E & 4 &  & 1;  E 4 &  FE 2 D<

!%"&  : "& 8"&:<

 &   @&!"  % @&&    & "  " &&="<

@&E10E0 6" "%&A""  &   C D @ %&  "  "  %%& & =&6!"9=@7@' %"'<

6& 8 &&=&A '&:9&<

  & = :&& A    &  !:!&   6 & "%= ? ! &<

6!"!&79% &&  :6" "  &  & 7  "% !>! =  %"  &  :9& % && =F 8 %89&6&C +4431. E2< 4-G- %E04G E2:D<

&&@%8 8=@&!" !=@&&   "&& @>&!%"&"<



/01.2/233.  #0/0#  

'  2 *1  '*+), , , ( )', *

4E   &   "  44 &: 233.  @  (  "  4.5&233.& % @&&  E

2E ":9&E

0E , HE

BE '7@66& @#' &"E

1E  ! @&!" 7 '  &  !!  +E133E## 7 &&  %&%&76& "%E

;E &("!!&6?"72336E7FA (&!"E

.E 6!  %&   =@ %'& 6!  &  %"& >&   "  03 9 8  &6& %8  : 6" " C$FI*F6=;;33B  D%' !&8  & %:6!"!&?&EG2 6" " :6" " 4. 9 2331 C +D<  !"!   &  =   !&6 & !, %'&%&A& & ! &< & >&  "  : 6" " % ' %&  % ' "&= ?  &  (&E B2  +E  %"& >& &  %8  %  &'="!!!, %' '&>&9&7('E  A668  %" &         ++ J$  J



%6! %"&>&&&6"?%&=@7@666" " %A66



/01.2/233.