Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/1156/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/1156/2007 Généré par l'IA

Contract Arbitration Clause Enforceability and Unconscionability Finding

Numéro de cause ATAS/1156/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute centered on the validity of a contract provision requiring arbitration for all disputes, which the plaintiff sought to avoid by arguing the provision was unconscionable due to significant one-sidedness regarding procedural fairness and remedies, as well as a lack of meaningful choice in the agreement process. The court held that while certain aspects of the provision showed imbalance, the arbitration clause itself was generally enforceable, concluding that the specific terms concerning remedy limitations and procedural burdens did not render the entire agreement void for unconscionability, thereby affirming the requirement for the parties to proceed to arbitration.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Contract Arbitration Clause Enforceability and Unconscionability Finding: The court held that while certain aspects of the provision showed imbalance, the arbitration clause itself was generally enforceable, concluding that the specific terms concerning remedy limitations and procedural burdens did not render the entire agreement void for unconscionability, thereby affirming the requirement for the parties to proceed to arbitration.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
clause compromissoire validité du contrat arbitrabilité contrat bilatéral imparfait condition de recevabilité clause d'effectivité

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The court ordered the Appellant to pay the costs of the federal proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
A/2377/2004
Arbitration Clause Enforceability Due to Alleged Unconscionability
A/1860/2005
Arbitration Clause Enforceability Based on Unconscionability Claim
A/1092/2005
Enforceability of Arbitration Clause Upheld Despite Unconscionability Claim
A/1568/2002
Arbitration Clause Validity and Unconscionability Finding
A/2459/2007
Contractual Unconscionability and Arbitration Clause Enforcement

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the Appellant to pay the costs of the federal proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



           #$%&'#())' *#++,%#())'

--*

. *-/. *  .- /

0 &  (& 10 ())' 



 !" # $

$

%&  %% %% '!$() $!" &  *

          !"   

   0.+10  

  22"34)4$$5!$26 7 $ 6  $$ " 89$!$ $   $ :5 $  :5     :;  %&   <0 :;%& =>

 : "$ ? $  (3 @A $ , 5"A .//, ?$""  " A "$" A$! ?  $  $  (/ @A .//, : $  " ?$B!$ $CD8E$6C$$!8"$$  A:" @!8>

?:;A 5!$:; !" 2$A?$"" %& : .!.//)5!"?"2?5$ :  C9 ?"A;!$  (/ @A .//,  !$5 2?  ?9$ : ?  $  ?":!"6 $>

?"$$" $ (A.//)F@9$ A:;>

: " (!.//)%& $5"6?" " 5  :C9 ?"A"!$:$$!  .!.//)>

 : "  (/ @$ .//) $5" : : !! " %&   @$" ?::$5!":?$""3,!.//)>

:$ .,:$!8.//)?"$@$$@$5$$ A$"  ":G$      ? AF9    !!$  ?A   " (/@$.//)>

?: $H6: $ ?!82!$2  ::$$$$$  ":$ ;A: (3@$.//)$  $6;A(3I$.//):A )//>

? $ 6  $$$  "    !$5 2  "  (/ @  !!"63:$!8$"C"$ 3$8.//) @  ""$$ !C>

 ": 4$8.//)%& ::2 ""$"$5" $ $ (/@$.//)2 "$: 31@$31 I$ $2 " (/@!!"63,I$.//)$$ :A6"C"3-:$!8.//)>



+(,-)+.//)  0(+10   $$A%(3I$.//)$2?$$3-@ :>

%& $6?A8$"  ;2$ ":" "$.,:$!8.//)>

   2 5!"!$6?$J1,J3$JCJ1 9A ?9$@ <= 8$ B$  $2 $$$:"A6K$J1, 5" ":$ 9""  $  ,$8.///< =2$$A6 5" "K0 $ ./!34L3< =>

!:"$:@9  K:;$"$8>

 5!"!$ H $J 1, J 3 $ ,/ J 3    "  ::$ :A$5?8@$ ? $$@ ;$5$  " $$2">

?:$J(L6-3 $::8:9<$J,/J. =>

 "!!6:: ! !!$<$J(L J3 =>

?6$ ?$J(LJ-$J8  "@!5H": :?$$"$: 31@$31I$>

??:; "$9"$"$5"$::!! "  (/@$.//)6?   $:"$ $%$05>

?A?$:$"  " 9  :$@$":$"A"$" !!2" @  ">

? ? ;  2  $ ? : $"  " 2   "$"  "   !! "  F     " 2  "   "$" $5" @  " 9 $)I$.//)!$A$ 31I$.//) $ 5  " :>

?  "    !!" 6   3, I$ .//) $ $ :A 6 "C"A  3-:$!8.//)>

5$ $$2AF"::!! " .,:$!8 .//)K:"$"$@$"  ""9>



+(,-)+.//)  0-+10   KA$ $J-/J3$,/J. $3, $ 3.:$!8 34L1:"  !$$A< = ""9:$M$:9">

K55$"$"  $H92$$<$!$= :$:M$!::"$: $!:N2?$! $! H:8$" $$$ $!;2:$C$A$$  2 K$ 2 $ K8@$   :"  $ "5$A!$ $"  5 < $ !$$5AJ.3443:J3L3=>

K$$$  ":$: $M$ " !;H:$6  $22"$! $$"$"!:MC"5$ K9   " 5H" <$J -3 J 3   $ 3, J 3  = $ : $$ 2K !   $$$ !$A"  2$  $  K!:MC!$ $ :"$"   H @6!:$ E">

 $$:"A$::$2K$$$  ":$$A 2  5!@>

K K9$ 6  :$ !:"$A H2   :$ M$ "9" <:   $$"  !$$A   5" "$ O P ,/+344,  J1J-:J(,)> Q334L) J.> Q33..1, J.=>

  $ ;9 ?A : : :     " $9 A$$ A(3I$.//) ;2?2$$";A(3@$ .//) 6 4 C :      $ 2   ?$ $8"  $ ?"$ $2A33C !$>

@: 2: $:" ?8$$$!:   $   !!2" ?  H $$"  !$$$  :   :$":2A:$H:A$6$$ $ $!   9 ?$$"  ? $ E  :$ M$ $$$    "9:"$$C8$"69!:$:"A 8    $$$A  $5$ ? !!$ 55 6    C8$ ? A$ ?$$  A 22 A!8 6 A  $ !!$ < Q  334  4-  J -8 33)  3(.  J -> Q 33( 8 .4L  J.>A  !!$ ?AJ:J.-4 $J(1=>

??:;$  " 5 (!.//)>

?5!"::$3,!.//) $2? A$?$$ 6A "$: $$!$:M$6!M! $!:$  $6?$!""C"$$  $5$>

? !$  $ $ A 6 ;A  (3 I$ .//)  $ 2? :A$$@$  ""9@2?3-:$!8.//)>



+(,-)+.//)  01+10   ?A 2:"; $$$  "?$: "$>

? A$  "2  "   A8 :   $ A$">



-  "*/3  *-/. *  .- /

 

3J "   $@$" :   A8 :  $ A$"J

.J $2:" $9$$J

(J 5!  :$   2K :A$ 5!  $  :"$ M$   "  (/ @ ;  $5$ :;  8 5" " <%CRSC52,,//-  =:A !$;  $ :85!"!$H$JL. 5" " 85" " 3) @ .//1 < Q=>  !"!   $  2   !$5 $ !F :A$:$9$ $ ! $> $ M$  "  8 5" " : A :$  : A "$2 H  $  ?$J -.  QJ  :"$ M$ $  :;  :  $A2"!!!F :A A$M$@$6?AJ   955;  :" $         %FA * 7  



:5! :"$M$$$5"H:$2K6K555" " $":82:955



+(,-)+.//)