Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/115/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/115/2004 Généré par l'IA

Statutory Interpretation of Property Forfeiture Criteria

Numéro de cause ATAS/115/2004
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case addresses an appeal concerning the proper interpretation of a statute regarding the forfeiture of property used in criminal activity. The court reasoned that the statutory language, when read in context with related provisions, clearly indicated that the forfeiture provision applied only to property seized under specific enumerated circumstances, which were not present in the appellant's situation. Therefore, the lower court erred in ordering forfeiture because the seizure did not meet the requisite statutory criteria, leading to the reversal of the forfeiture order.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, Art. 64 LTF; Statutory Interpretation of Property Forfeiture Criteria: The court reasoned that the statutory language, when read in context with related provisions, clearly indicated that the forfeiture provision applied only to property seized under specific enumerated circumstances, which were not present in the appellant's situation. Therefore, the lower court erred in ordering forfeiture because the seizure did not meet the requisite statutory criteria, leading to the reversal of the forfeiture order.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
péremption crime contre les biens ordre de saisie interprétation des lois saisie de biens restriction de droit public à la propriété

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Applied for the order regarding court costs.
Art. 64 LTF
Applied for the order regarding legal aid.
Généré par l'IA
A/2406/2004
Property Forfeiture Statute Vagueness Challenge
A/4467/2006
Property Forfeiture Statute Vagueness and Due Process Challenge
A/772/2004
Property Forfeiture Nexus Challenge Upheld
A/3105/2007
Appeal Regarding Knowledge of Possession and Jurisdictional Value of Stolen Property
A/411/2007
Property Forfeiture Invalid Due to Defective Notice

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied for the order regarding court costs.

Art. 64 LTF

Applied for the order regarding legal aid.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

     

    !"#$"!%&&" !""'!%&&(

)

* +,* -  * -+

""  %&&(

#.  / 0

  

   1111111111 



+ - 2-+  - +-  !  " #$! %&'( )* ++,-

                   . &/.

 3+

%2 3", 4444444444  -  "-,5 %1&2   6-*+ %11'!   "+*- " 3+ 4444444444! 7  "--"-  *+ %1182 9  + : 7 9-  -- ,+  5--6+ "9  " ** ;

,: " % ,+ %1182

&2  ( 6-*+ &'''!  +  <*+ " ,:+ =+.:)   >  "? 6-  "+ ;  + + " ,:+   6 " 9-! ",+++- ; 9-<! *+ :+  -"2 9  7   9 :@ 7  " " 6! "A! *+ + 9B< " "+C.#+   ( 5 %118  79 -7!   " ** + "? $ ::+,- * 66  % *,5 %1182

02  "-++ " ( 6-*+ &'''!    " -,- ; 9-  ++ " , *- :  :-+" " *,5 %118 ; 6-*+ &'''! + %&D 8 62

2 9-! : "  5 6+!  -<- 7  ++ "  ,, -,-  ,+ "  ++ 6++) "+66++   6,, ","-  ,+ " 95+<+ " +2

2  "-++ " &% , &''%!    E-  ","  ,+6 7  * " 9- "-:+  +,+ 6+C- :  +  7 ") !   :*+ +"- 7  ,5, "  ,, -,-  ,+ "  ++ "+66++2

F2  + " *+ &''% . "- ;    ,+ :  "+) ;

 ,,++  "   ,+) "9 G ,, 5E "  ,:- .! 9-  +E-    "-++2  6+ ,7 7 ":+  0% , &''%!  9C : "9+*+- +*  79+ +  ")  +,:+5 " ,5  ,, -,-2

82 *+- ;  :!   ! "  :-*+ " %0 E+ &''%!    E " 2    : 7  :,+) "++ ;  ,+  -+- :+7 9-  ,+6, " 5 6+ ,+  7  *!  *#!  :-+ " &'D''' 6 C "-: ",+ : *+ 79 ,5,  ,+ "  ++ "+66++2

/%01%/&''% . 0/.

(2  + " %' E+ &''%!    7  *  +<  +,+ 6+C- :  +2  6+ ,7 79  -  +*+- +* ":+  0% , &''%  "," 7  "+ 6 95E "9 -C,   5 "  "-+ 6+ &''%2

12 :+ :+!    ","- ; 9+--  :+ "  "-+ 6+ &''% 6+ " :*+ -C,+  "+2 9- 9 6+, C-- : + " && *+ &''&2

%'2  7  ++ "    9-+ : ,"+6+-  79 :!  9-+ ,+-  " " % , &''%!  +  :+- "  +!  6+ ,7 79  :-"+  +6,+   *  "-: " E+ " 9-2

%%2  + " %' 5 &''0! 9-  -7- 7  -:C *+ :+  -"   "+:+ " "9 *2 9::+ "  "+!   :"+  + " 9",+++ 6+  79+ 9-+ : C5  &''&2

%&2  + " %8 *,5 &''0!  +!  * "  * --,!  ",+ 7  ++ 6++) "   :*+ $ +"-- ,, "+66++2 )  7  "++ "  5 6+  "  #< : " -+ ,:+! 9+- ++,-  " ::- "9:  "," " ,+ "95+<+ " + "  2

/%01%/&''% . /.

 -+

%2  + " % *,5 &''& ,"+6+  + <*+  9<++ E"+++ = H & '>! -  *+<  % ? &''0!  ++-  +5  "  +   + +7!

,,   + +* ;  + 6-"-  9.

*++ =+.:)  G IG (0%2%'J H 62 + %!    F +- %!

  #+66 % >2

6,-, ; 9+ 0 +- 0 " "+:++ ++ "  + " % *,5 &''& ,"+6+  !   +"+ * 9-  *+< "  + :-+-  :" "*  ,,++  "   ,+) "9.*++  -- ,+ "966+  +5  "  +2  ,:- " +5 " -  ")  -5+ : K " :- ++<2

&2  + :! 7D    5 " --, "  7  "-++ 7-  -    :+!  ,"+6+  : " E7D;

D*+ "  -:  2  * "-++ "+ $ +6+-    :- ;  + " D+- "  =62 L&'%1 "  ++   +C>2

02  9:)! 9++,- 9 : : " " * "-++ :+79 9-+ "-E; C:+,-   2  9 " - " 6,  ::++ M  7 ":+  "-++ ++<+!  ++ -,+7 " 9- 9-+ ,"+6+-  7  ,5, " , -,-  ,+ "-,+ "  ++ 6++) "+66++!  + ", 7  "++ "9 ,+  -+2  *+ "9 :"   " "  "-++   2

/%01%/&''% . /.

  -+3  +,* -  * -+

  45   6 7 8   79: ";% -<

 7 5 

%2 -   *5 H

 5

&2 9", H

02   "-++ " :  +  <*+ " ,:+  " " &% , &''%  :  "," " ,+ 6,- :   H

2 6,  :+ "  7D :* 6,    :- E<, "  "-+ " 0' E ")  +6++ : :+ ,,"- "-  +5 6-"- " ! G#N+O#67+ F! F''   !  + C,:+2  ,-,+ "+ M > +"+7 C, 7 "-++   "-+ 5+  +  : "  "-++ 7-H 5> C: : 7 ,+6   +, :*+ ","   "-++H > :  +< "   "  :-2 G+  ,-,+  + :  + --, -,--   > 5>  > +."!  +5 6-"- "   : :   ,+)    7D+ "* "- +*52  ,-,+ "  ,+   ,A " :*! 7+  E+  ,-,+ D+ D<+ " :+)  :+ " 2 G -<, E+  ,-,+  "-++ 7-  D*:: " 7   -- C:-"+-   =2 %0&! %'F  %'( >2

 <66+) M  -+" M

+ PP Q+ G Q

 :+ 6, " :- $  +6+- C :+ ++ 7D; D66+ 6-"- "  + :  <66

/%01%/&''%