Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/1147/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/1147/2006 Généré par l'IA

Substantial Performance and Defective Work Compensation Dispute

Numéro de cause ATAS/1147/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute arose from a request for payment based on a contractual obligation, where one party claimed the work was substantially complete and properly performed, warranting payment, while the other party resisted payment, asserting significant defects and incomplete work despite accepting partial performance and making prior payments. The court held that although the work contained defects, the record demonstrated the party providing services substantially performed the contract, entitling them to payment, offset by the reasonable cost to remedy the remaining deficiencies, affirming the lower court's determination regarding the scope of performance and the necessary recoupment for uncorrected defects.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Substantial Performance and Defective Work Compensation Dispute: The court held that although the work contained defects, the record demonstrated the party providing services substantially performed the contract, entitling them to payment, offset by the reasonable cost to remedy the remaining deficiencies, affirming the lower court's determination regarding the scope of performance and the necessary recoupment for uncorrected defects.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
obligations contractuelles prestation partielle demande partielle offre effective indemnité pour inconvénients indu

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Imposed costs for the unsuccessful appeal.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



                 !!"

##$

 # %& '% %& $ #%'$ ' &$

'()   * ! +)   



 !"#$%&%&"'( )





)

     + !,-,$#)! )#$ '"'./01.





       

   '&23'   "$"%47)&55/!,"),87")0+"#)$" 9:#;")!<#$,"$,,)=,)#>&55/?

"&/,)#>&55/!)@,)<,)?

A""#,),",)"7?

 A" ). )  ,)!    8  ,$)) " +   "$$8+."99$;1<<)$,))"@,) "$,7)"#,())$#"7&55/!)$)) $!),$8)$;#)"$"%47))=,)#>&55/?

+.)"")-

 ,,,

# '$ - . &$ # %& '% %& $ #%'$ ' &$

* /++0   1

2+030)) 4 / 5 6 &78

%-  ) 0 +       +  "  " 0   ))<$,"$"%47))<#$=,)#>&55/-

&- A("#))8">-

3- )8,$");))-

4- ,,)"A)-B5 !<#,)"8A,.)<# ),$)C)""$"357"1)<),, ##"$"$ ><$"$"!D9EF9<8/!/554   !)@#,-"$,)C),;$-#$#")G H"8@)#)8"$)"$>))," "$))8$?>H@,,8#)<)#,."#")) )"$?H,);)",$))-D#$# )) ,  ) $$#) $#$$  )) H >H ) H '"!  ><$"$",,)#)18A "."$.>-#$#"#)#(



234562&55/  '323'   " ,.! 8 ) 7)!  8  "$ ))8$ ) A.,, " 8$)$@,$"$)I)-%3&!%5/)%5=H-





    ;<<1G $")G       JK L >D

 ,<#" ,$) C)))<$@,))D$))"A ))0 A$#,;<<





234562&55/