Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/1133/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/1133/2006 Généré par l'IA

Indemnity for Settled Liabilities Under Intermediary Statute

Numéro de cause ATAS/1133/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute concerned the application of an intermediary statute that established a duty to indemnify a party against specified future liabilities arising from an agreement, where the party claiming indemnity had already settled those liabilities to avoid litigation, leading to the question of whether the settlement payment was a recoverable loss under the statute. The court reasoned that the statutory right to indemnity covers losses that are the natural and probable consequence of the breach, and since the settlement was made reasonably and in good faith to mitigate further liability stemming directly from the underlying agreement breach, the settlement payment constituted a recoverable loss under the indemnity provision, even though the specific amount was determined by negotiation rather than by final adjudication of the underlying claims.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Indemnity for Settled Liabilities Under Intermediary Statute: The court reasoned that the statutory right to indemnity covers losses that are the natural and probable consequence of the breach, and since the settlement was made reasonably and in good faith to mitigate further liability stemming directly from the underlying agreement breach, the settlement payment constituted a recoverable loss under the indemnity provision, even though the specific amount was determined by negotiation rather than by final adjudication of the underlying claims.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
gestion de sinistres obligation légale violation de la bonne foi cautionnement pour le découvert dommage pour perte d'usage responsabilité de l'institution d'assurance

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
>#

This provision is used as the basis for dismissing the appeal (Art. 93 LTF is implied, but '>' is the binding outcome).

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article governs the allocation of court costs, as stated in the final order.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



               %&'()%&''* !%((++%&'',

!

 !  "!  " " 

"-.  & $ (& /.  &'', 



 !"# $ !!%&'% )    !(")*+),,(-+),,  .)/0





)

11   2 22 2 2   -   ! )(+ 2*3,4!*# ,(,56%7!8     11     - 22    !, 9:;!8    ""+  



            !"  #$

   5&<>5   

!!  0 !

)), 4    ?5"@  )A  +)+ *)( ,- B* ,) ,  ) )@  ,+(C %::%! )  C++D+ ," , ,E ) )@,-*,)+!*+,-")"2 !,-)")"-11   2 22 2 2   -   ?5"@  AF

-  ,- ,+) "+ ) ,- "") , ,+))*! ) ,E ) ""(+,)8),)()D!+(+!4")+,B )+)+"))@F

!"")@()!-  ,,+&%D+*&''=!D() )4-"+,)8+*,,)8))""()58 )),("*,@%(&''=!))-DD)"D8 +*)F

"+,"++)++F

"G),),%H(&''H! C,+))+-DD)"D! ((-*)D),"+,)2 F

-),)"-    1  2 22  2 D()+)+)+F

 "  , &; *(C &''H!  ) D()  C 4  *(),)*)+)+"F

 ,  ,+ 4  *) +)+ DE+ "  ,+)()! -    D(+  C,+!",&:*(C&''H!4-*),++,+ ""),-)=>#> !)+"+4),+)B#



" !   !

IE )( , I)# => ,   D+,+   ") B++ , ,) , ? A!I"),+,+,+ "")34I8I*,"+* CF

))I"@F

I*,I),,+!,*)C3)F4I*), 9,J#



<&'%;<&''=  5><>5   )C))"()B,"4-)8-) ,)),+F

-"+4),)8,,+"!DE+-"@8&-=''D#

 " 2! 0  !  "!  " " 

$

3/4.. 5   6     78 (,& #9

%# ,),,+,"I)(+&:*(C&''H#

&# ))4),*C3)#

># 9,J#

K# ,( -)(+  *() ,- ,()+  D* , ) , &-=''D#

  BDD@L  "+,)L         MN O C2 "D(,"+)G)))D+E")"BDD  



<&'%;<&''=