Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/1126/2014 • CJ GE ATAS/1126/2014 Généré par l'IA

Property Co-Ownership Dissolution and Mandatory Sale

Numéro de cause ATAS/1126/2014
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appeal concerned a dispute over the partition of property following the dissolution of a co-ownership arrangement, where one party sought to compel the sale of the entirety of the property, arguing that a physical division was impossible or would severely diminish its value, while the other party contested the necessity of a full sale, preferring a partition in kind or division of usufruct rights. The court affirmed the lower court's decision, reasoning that since the property could not be conveniently divided physically without substantially reducing its value, and given the nature of the asset, the mandatory sale of the whole property was the appropriate and necessary solution to terminate the co-ownership as requested by the party seeking the division.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Property Co-Ownership Dissolution and Mandatory Sale: The court affirmed the lower court's decision, reasoning that since the property could not be conveniently divided physically without substantially reducing its value, and given the nature of the asset, the mandatory sale of the whole property was the appropriate and necessary solution to terminate the co-ownership as requested by the party seeking the division.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
partage de la propriété droit à la propriété usufruit valeur des ventes valeur litigieuse liquidation du régime matrimonial

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the court fees.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

A/1288/2014

### [ATAS/1126/2014](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1970438) du 03.11.2014 ( LPP ) , PARTAGE LPP

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2014/0011/ATAS_001126_2014_A_1288_2014.pdf)

* /