Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/1109/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/1109/2005 Généré par l'IA

Contractual Advance Payments Conditional Upon Performance

Numéro de cause ATAS/1109/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A litigant challenged a ruling that determined certain payments made under a contract were conditional, asserting they were unconditional advances subject to a setoff based on the other party's subsequent breach, while the opposing party maintained the payments were contingent upon performance as stipulated in the contract. The court reasoned that the contractual language clearly established the payments as conditional advances tied directly to the completion of specified work, and thus, the failure to complete that work excused the obligation to make further payments, correctly justifying the lower court's determination that the advance payments were not absolute obligations subject only to later setoff for breach.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Contractual Advance Payments Conditional Upon Performance: The court reasoned that the contractual language clearly established the payments as conditional advances tied directly to the completion of specified work, and thus, the failure to complete that work excused the obligation to make further payments, correctly justifying the lower court's determination that the advance payments were not absolute obligations subject only to later setoff for breach.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
obligation de conclure avance maintien du paiement du salaire prestation en vue du paiement décision anticipée en matière fiscale garantie d'exécution

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Provision cited for ordering the appellant to pay the court costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

                 !

"###$% &%'%" %

 " #( $# #( % "#$% $ (%

$)   *  +  ! 



&!'(!))*$($!)$$  !



! 

.. $% $# #( % (/"#$%0 #1(  %+, ) $!$( -./012&

     

   #/31#  

))) !!$)5 #$&$)$!()/1&6 .++7)"$  8888888888 &$! 9 '6!!$ )'  $!!$  :$ ! )' ! )'$&$)$!(;

  )($$ ) /+ $ /00/   * '   :$<(  !< )'$&$)$!( ) ' (9.+=! >!())) !!$)'$&$)$!(;

  )/4>$/00/;

  !()$<!  !)  )$ ;

 5 ?! ) $6 ) ( ) + >$! /00@ ! 5 ?! ) $6 :()(  )  ).@!6 /00A!5 ?!!! ($!$! !$ (!$ ;

 5)$)  !$))!$ )//&6 /00A )*  !$!&)5$! !$(!$ : )5(&!$     "      9%$;

" $%  . (% " #( $# #( % "#$% $ (%

* 33,  45 67   (8

.B  )  (&!$ ()$ !  :$ )  !  < ! -!   $$ )'<$  ! )'!)  "$  8888888888 ! ) $ :$  $&  ) !C  !$*  !$   2 '?!  ! ( ) !  ((! !$ ! &$   $ $ ) )$  ) '  $$ * ) )$ ) (! () '! !)'&$)!$ 6$B

/B !9:$   "      9%$B 

1B D C< !) () <*!$$&!E

.B 2B

/B (6>!$&) B

1B !!!$()$6>!$&B

@B $C!$FGB

 3.4/+3/00/   #131#  

AB H$<   !< )  $!( ) ! &$ !D( $* )  ! &$ )!(  (D(!)!  &)'$$!()! &$) 6B

4B :$!)(! $ !<)$!()! &$<$C$6 2!!)  !9$2 )!C !$*!)$ )*FG!$&$!(FGB

,B ))$::( ! !< !D$:: A!45<$* B

7B & D)2)' ()!!$ :$ - $ ! )!$&!$!)5CC!)  !B

+B $ $$!()! &$!?! ($ ( ) ()$B

.0B !$B

..B !  *!$! $!$)'< !B

@B &$!  < ! 9 )(  9   $  &   !  )< <$  $6)(B

AB ( & !): $)5< !$B

4B ( &:)B

  C ::$ E   ($)!E   $  % 6%     $: ) (! ?!!!$:$(< !$$$*'9'::$:()(  ) $ C ::

 3.4/+3/00/