Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/1108/2014 • CJ GE ATAS/1108/2014 Généré par l'IA

Civil Partnership Property Division Dispute

Numéro de cause ATAS/1108/2014
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

This case concerns a dispute over the division of property following the dissolution of a civil partnership, specifically challenging the application of a particular property regime stipulated in a prior agreement. The court reasoned that the relevant contractual agreement governing the property division was indeed valid and applicable between the parties, and thus upheld the decision regarding the distribution of assets based on the terms previously established by the partners, affirming the lower court's ruling on the property sharing.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Civil Partnership Property Division Dispute: The court reasoned that the relevant contractual agreement governing the property division was indeed valid and applicable between the parties, and thus upheld the decision regarding the distribution of assets based on the terms previously established by the partners, affirming the lower court's ruling on the property sharing.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
partage de la propriété contestation civile accords particuliers société de personnes dissolution du régime matrimonial union civile
Généré par l'IA
A/155/2008
Partnership Dissolution Property Division Dispute
A/944/2008
Registered Partnership Property Division Valuation Dispute
A/3906/2013
Partnership Dissolution Property Partition Dispute
A/935/2008
Appeal Regarding Confirmation of Community Property Partition Deed in Civil Union Dissolution
A/1571/2004
Property Division and Support Obligations Following Relationship Termination

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

A/1768/2014

### [ATAS/1108/2014](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1970347) du 29.10.2014 ( LPP ) , PARTAGE LPP

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2014/0011/ATAS_001108_2014_A_1768_2014.pdf)

* /