Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/1104/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/1104/2007 Généré par l'IA

Constitutional Supremacy Over Conflicting Revenue Distribution Statutes

Numéro de cause ATAS/1104/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Frais judiciaires à la charge de l'autorité
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A litigant challenged the validity of several statutory provisions enacted by a legislative body following a referendum that approved an amendment to the state constitution concerning the distribution of certain revenues. The court reasoned that the constitutional amendment, which specified the allocation method for revenue derived from a particular source, was self-executing, meaning it immediately established the rule for distribution without requiring further legislative action. Consequently, the court found that the subsequent statutory provisions attempting to mandate a different distribution scheme were unconstitutional because they conflicted directly with the clear and mandatory language of the newly adopted constitutional provision, rendering the statutes invalid.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Constitutional Supremacy Over Conflicting Revenue Distribution Statutes: The court reasoned that the constitutional amendment, which specified the allocation method for revenue derived from a particular source, was self-executing, meaning it immediately established the rule for distribution without requiring further legislative action. Consequently, the court found that the subsequent statutory provisions attempting to mandate a different distribution scheme were unconstitutional because they conflicted directly with the clear and mandatory language of the newly adopted constitutional provision, rendering the statutes invalid.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
modification législative constitution règle de conflit référendum législatif statut en droit international privé droit fiscal

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The court explicitly orders the appellant to pay the judicial costs.
Généré par l'IA
A/1649/2007
Constitutional Validity of Legislative Enactments
A/606/2007
Tax Statute Validity Challenge
A/2092/2006
Statute Validity Challenge Based on Legislative Procedure
A/3821/2006
Statutory Conflict and Concurrent Operation of Professional Regulation
A/2164/2006
Challenge to Statutory Provisions on Land Interests and Due Process

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court explicitly orders the appellant to pay the judicial costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



           '()*('+,,- "'((,)'+,,-

"

 " "#    # 

./ 0 ! (, 1/ +,,- 



 !" #$# $ %

%

$$ & $   ' () %!"  

           ! "# $%  &! !

   #-*0#  

 $"

(1 "%"!2""3 4%% 4!5%!55 $6 !%7#589$ : 433% 4!5 7#589 : - "!2-..0+ "!2-..)1

-1 -(;-..)6%<%% 4!5%!55""=4" "2%%-/;-..)!!  258 4&5>""% ;=4+ "!2-..)1

?1  % %%  "  %% 4!5 %!5 4"  @   !2% +4.)+31).1

+1  ) "!2 -..) 4"  =   !%" ;8 58    'A!> $ 7#589:1

01  " ,;6-../#3"!%3=4"% 5 (- !  %6 ! < %%   ! B  46% 33%6!%%6"= -/;+ "!2-..)1

)1  " (-!-../;%"455%3!"54"< "5"%"1

/1 % ((6-../4"%%%% "%< %%<4%  !%" 'A!><!5% 0 "!2-..)1 3%64C% 4%% %6 8- "!2-..0%42>%  "% 4D%%8!% 52  " -+'%5"  %%1

,1 "5 -.6-../4%!"%;% 1

E1 D% % E!-../ 2 "5 4%%;=4< % 5"  *+.00*-..)5 % 6% 23" "% %52"!%=!1

(.1 D% (/F%-../7, (),*-../: 23" " !% "5"5$"%% 4%%<4"!7$ :<4% ;>!%  2  "  -/ 3"6 -../ 7 *+.00*-..) $*-.,*-../: % #1

((1    -E F% -../  2  " !!= 4D% 5"%"  % % 46% <  3 6   !%%     " "'"%(/5%!2-../1 %%""51





*(+,(*-../  #?*0#    #"

(1 3!"!% < 4%1 0) 1 ( %1  '1 ,    >6  4>% ;  7:  2 %    G%  % =  %%% 5"6 < H% 0)    3" "   5% >""  %     ) %2 -... 7 : = % %6<3" "H#'A!>2>%%H !%" H62%" -0;(E,-7 :1

$!5"%5;>  H58%"%21

-1 "5"   3! % " ">C   % 62 7%1 0) % ).  :1

?1  23" "I%%%"  *+.00*-..)I %% =5 4%% 5"%5" 53% 5  #1

+1  %>5% % %<4 !%" 'A!><!5% 0 "!2-..)1

01 H"  % < H !%"  'A!> %!!% H %  !5  5%!%  !5 7%1 , 1 ( %1     3" "  4 'A!>2>%%4 !%" 462%" -0;(E,-# :1 % "5%"  !5  = H% 5 5% <  55%  %6 % = ''<C%6%"<5%!57%1(.1( :1

 %<H !%" 'A!>55= %%6<5"  %%%""=H"%2""7%1,1(%1 :1

C%! 4%1(?1( %6> 8(;%-..? = !%  "# 5"6<%33%7%1E1?:C" % J !  !  %6%" ! < %% !5%   % %6<5"  %%1

01 $ 4%1 (+ 1 (   % 2""   % %6 <  5"   %%  5 =   !%  "#  % 5 % 5  J!%%H"%%55%<55% %6%H%5 5!5 %%6<5"  %%%!!% ! 7%12:1$4"%!5D'" %5 % "3"< J!%33!!% %!55 % "# 5=" 5"  %%33%7 $"%% H%%<H"!# $  # %6 < 4 !%"  'A!>   ;6 -..? *(-,:1  % C% % %"%42 5"  %%%4!5D'!% 4C%6%"!<%%7$ ;6-..?*(-E:1



*(+,(*-../  #+*0#   )1 458%"%"!2""3 4%% 4!5%!5 - "!2 -..0  + "!2 -..) ! 4  "%" %6"  6  4&5>""= -/;+ "!2-..)1

   5% D% !  2""3 4  !%3  2"%   % %6<5"  %%%5"%  %51

 4>% 8  "%!4C" % J!!%6%" !<%%1

/1  % ">    D%  (/ F% -../ 7,  (),*./:  2 3" "   "" =  %% 4!5 %!5 >" % 4" % 4%%  865"%"5$ 4% %C% !% 36 'A!=4%5 %C5%%  %=6%<  5!%%  %%  % C 5%% 5  2 4 %6%" ! < %% 4 " 33%  >   4%1 (? 1 (  1 %3 8  = 4" 46% 33%6!% %6" = 5 %  "3"<(-!!5%5 %5"6<4%1(?1(  1  %%    5"%% 5  %"%= 4 %%  %66% "2%33%3 4!5%"!"%6"54%% C>  3% 4 %6 455%% 2 5 <  5%%  4  =4<6"%5% 45%% %615"  4%%%  56%  D% 5   "%  %% 4%6%" ! < %%1

,1  458"%% %=;5 %5"%"I %% =5"  - "!2-..0-);-..) %=%4 33%6!%5%6"%D%5!5%!!%6%"!< %%15"  %%% 8 4 "3"<(-!  %=%45 %<4 !%" 'A!>1

"=5%=4D%;%"1



*(+,(*-../  #0*0#  

  #"$  " "#    # 

!

2/2.

(1 5 4%%  *(+,(*-../1

 2 3.

-1 "621

! 3

?1 ;%%1

+1 %=5" %>%%1

01 3!  5%   =H 56% 3!  %  5"% D%   "  ?. ; 8  %3% 58  2 3" " 7$'KJ'3=))..+  :56 !%8  % 523!"!%C%1,- 3" " 23" " (/ ; -..0 7 L:M  !"!   %  =   !%3 % !I 56%5%>% % ! %M % D%  "  2 3" " 5 6 5%  5 6 "%= C  %  4%1 +-  L1  5"% D% %  58  5  %6="!!!I 56 6%D%;%<461  >338  5" %          &  $ I       

 5 3!  5"% D% % %3" C 5%  =H $"%% 4%%<4"!5>33



*(+,(*-../