Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/1099/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/1099/2005 Généré par l'IA

Validity of Transaction Under Administrative Capacity Restraint

Numéro de cause ATAS/1099/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court addressed a dispute regarding the validity of a transaction when a party was under an active restraint on their legal capacity to contract, specifically concerning a transfer of property that occurred after the restraint was imposed but before a formal judicial declaration of incapacity. The court reasoned that the restraint on the individual's capacity, imposed via an administrative process, was effective immediately upon its entry, rendering the subsequent transaction voidable even without a prior judicial determination of incompetence, because the operative legal standard focused on the existence of the restraint itself rather than the formality of a judicial declaration of mental incapacity at the time of contracting.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Validity of Transaction Under Administrative Capacity Restraint: The court reasoned that the restraint on the individual's capacity, imposed via an administrative process, was effective immediately upon its entry, rendering the subsequent transaction voidable even without a prior judicial determination of incompetence, because the operative legal standard focused on the existence of the restraint itself rather than the formality of a judicial declaration of mental incapacity at the time of contracting.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
validité du contrat contrat de droit administratif jouissance des droits civils transmission de la propriété formalité administrative péremption de l'exécution de la décision

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision was used to rule on the costs of the proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               %&'(%)+ %,*((%)+



- .- !  -! !

!/ 0 '

# ,) 1 0 )+ 

  1#

   !  " # $%&'"! &0"& !(# & !")"## ! !")"## '" !"# *+,-.+../)*

1

    $$  $$)'1&2 & (& &&3.4+5"!6%

               !  "#$

   9+7*9  



("!#"& '&#" !## "':'9"/;#" < & .8 ( ) +553 & ' &/ # .- & '0= +55> # )0!  (") & ? &&0! 1"#/!&6"#"="&@'!"!0 A#"#( & "##'!"!&B""'&+")#.45,: <C

#"&0"&&#@"  ! "#$%&'"!!(#&!")"## !!")"##&  "/& ="#'"!"#&""''"##.,( ) +5532 "!#"'!"!&)0!&&0! 1"#/C

#" &#" &>")#+553''#"!"1!&#"&0"&C

 #@"&' & '0"! ## & "! & +3 ")# +553 " ' & #"2##'##9'!& '#" &@"''&")'#'&@D!1&'" '( A0 &'E0"!#6C

#B&"'& ="#&' "&+1+553& '#""!')"=##"&0"&! '("!D!"C

 # "! &BD! &   & +, 1##! +553 " 2  '0# 0!&.-'!=+553C

#'&#" &*)0=+553(0"!# ="#2B##)"! 0!"!&(?.4B83>+3A" C

#'&&0"&&+,)0=+553& '#""!!"&0"&C

!!&&!#"!?,4,4 !,4F"#?*&#"##"' &"&0!"!)& .+!0=.4,3: <C

 #" &0"& "%"! !  !  #" '" " "%  & G# !  &0!  & (?.B555?9"## "&0"&C



7*847+553  9*7*9  

 ! 2  .- !  -! !

#

314   5  6   7$ ,') "8

# 4 ; 

.? &"'!&!"!&#"&0"&C

+? &"0#" A)&0! &(?.B555?9A? C

*? "%#"'"&G#C  "6((/;  " &!;   "'%$ "#    

''(0& !"H!!!( "D"!"2@A#@(('( & "# &""') "#6((#



7*847+553