Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/1095/2008 • CJ GE ATAS/1095/2008 Généré par l'IA

Administrative Procedure Validity Challenge

Numéro de cause ATAS/1095/2008
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerned a dispute over the validity of a decision regarding administrative procedures, where the appellant contested the application of certain formal requirements to their situation. The court reasoned that the challenged administrative decision was valid because the procedural steps taken by the administrative body substantially complied with the relevant legal framework, and any minor deviation from the strict formal requirements did not prejudice the appellant's rights or alter the outcome of the matter, thus justifying the dismissal of the appeal.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Administrative Procedure Validity Challenge: The court reasoned that the challenged administrative decision was valid because the procedural steps taken by the administrative body substantially complied with the relevant legal framework, and any minor deviation from the strict formal requirements did not prejudice the appellant's rights or alter the outcome of the matter, thus justifying the dismissal of the appeal.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
recours contre des décisions administratives condition de recevabilité objet du litige arrêts en appréciation de validité notification valable décision-cadre
Généré par l'IA
A/1/2005
Administrative Order Validity and Factual Basis Review
A/4394/2015
Appeal Regarding Validity of Administrative Proceedings Upheld
A/2969/2014
Administrative Decision Challenge Dismissed on Procedural Grounds
A/2214/2007
Procedural Order Challenge Upheld
A/2757/2006
Validity of Document Amendments Based on Procedural Compliance

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

A/2278/2008

### [ATAS/1095/2008](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1962021) du 30.09.2008 ( PC ) , ADMIS

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2008/0010/ATAS_001095_2008_A_2278_2008.pdf)

* /