Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/1094/2008 • CJ GE ATAS/1094/2008 Généré par l'IA

Lease Assignment Fee Validity Dispute

Numéro de cause ATAS/1094/2008
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute concerned a demand for payment for fees relating to the assignment of a lease, where the appealing party argued that the contractual clause allowing for such a fee upon assignment was null and void because it allegedly allowed for an exorbitant and arbitrary amount, violating the principle of good faith and exceeding the actual economic service rendered. The court rejected the appeal, reasoning that the stipulated assignment fee was clearly defined in the contract and was not shown to be contrary to mandatory law or public policy, and therefore the clause was valid and binding upon the parties.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Lease Assignment Fee Validity Dispute: The court rejected the appeal, reasoning that the stipulated assignment fee was clearly defined in the contract and was not shown to be contrary to mandatory law or public policy, and therefore the clause was valid and binding upon the parties.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
cession de contrat paiement de l'émolument validité de la notification contrat de bail droit économique validité de clause compromissoire

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Imposes the cost of the federal proceedings on the appellant, as the appeal was rejected.
Généré par l'IA
A/1620/2002
Assignment Validity and Fee Obligation Under Contractual Written Notice Requirement
A/2590/2005
Validity of Assignment Without Contractual Consent
A/4359/2007
Contractual Assignment Validity Without Consent
A/3699/2006
Assignment Consent Dispute Regarding Reasonable Withholding
A/4252/2007
Contract Assignment Validity in Retail Installment Sale Dispute

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Imposes the cost of the federal proceedings on the appellant, as the appeal was rejected.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

A/1129/2008

### [ATAS/1094/2008](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1962020) du 30.09.2008 ( LPP ) , REJETE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2008/0010/ATAS_001094_2008_A_1129_2008.pdf)

* /