Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/1088/2008 • CJ GE ATAS/1088/2008 Généré par l'IA

Appeal of Administrative Interpretation of Regulatory Standard

Numéro de cause ATAS/1088/2008
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party appealed a decision regarding the application of a specific regulatory standard to an administrative filing, arguing the application was erroneous because the standard did not apply to the facts presented, which involved a situation where the administrative authority had interpreted the standard too broadly. The court determined that the administrative authority's interpretation was too expansive and did not align with the precise wording and legislative intent of the relevant regulation, thus partially upholding the appeal and setting aside the contested application of the standard.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Appeal of Administrative Interpretation of Regulatory Standard: The court determined that the administrative authority's interpretation was too expansive and did not align with the precise wording and legislative intent of the relevant regulation, thus partially upholding the appeal and setting aside the contested application of the standard.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
demande adressée à l'autorité arrêts en interprétation inobservation administrative de prescriptions d'ordre norme environnementale recours du personnel décision préjudicielle attaquable

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Imposed the costs of the federal procedure on the appellant due to the partial rejection of the appeal.
Généré par l'IA
A/3962/2013
Appeal Against Administrative Law Decision Upheld
A/2599/2004
Statutory Interpretation and Administrative Procedure Appeals
A/4394/2015
Appeal Regarding Validity of Administrative Proceedings Upheld
A/984/2024
Applicant's Appeal of Administrative Clarification of Prior Court Order Dismissed
A/3740/2006
Administrative Agency Regulation Enforcement Dispute

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Imposed the costs of the federal procedure on the appellant due to the partial rejection of the appeal.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

A/1952/2008

### [ATAS/1088/2008](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1962014) du 30.09.2008 ( AI ) , PARTIELMNT ADMIS

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2008/0010/ATAS_001088_2008_A_1952_2008.pdf)

* /