Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/1083/2008 • CJ GE ATAS/1083/2008 Généré par l'IA

Appeal of Denial of Social Security Benefits Based on Causal Link

Numéro de cause ATAS/1083/2008
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellant contested the rejection of their request for social security benefits, arguing that the lower administrative court erred in finding insufficient evidence of a causal link between their employment, which required extensive travel, and their alleged illness. The appellate court upheld the lower court's decision, reasoning that while the employment involved substantial travel, the appellant failed to provide medical or objective evidence demonstrating a direct, necessary, and essential link between that specific travel and the documented illness, thus not meeting the legal threshold for recognizing the condition as occupational.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Appeal of Denial of Social Security Benefits Based on Causal Link: The appellate court upheld the lower court's decision, reasoning that while the employment involved substantial travel, the appellant failed to provide medical or objective evidence demonstrating a direct, necessary, and essential link between that specific travel and the documented illness, thus not meeting the legal threshold for recognizing the condition as occupational.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
prestations de sécurité sociale lien de causalité preuve objective motifs médicaux litige d'assurances sociales documents de voyage

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF

The appeal was rejected based on the provision governing rejection by simplified procedure.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The appellant was ordered to pay the costs of the federal court proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

A/1017/2008

### [ATAS/1083/2008](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1962036) du 29.09.2008 ( AI ) , REJETE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2008/0010/ATAS_001083_2008_A_1017_2008.pdf)

* /