Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/1082/2008 • CJ GE ATAS/1082/2008 Généré par l'IA

Land Valuation Appeal Reassessment for Commercial Property

Numéro de cause ATAS/1082/2008
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case involved an appeal against a decision that partially admitted the appeal, with the appellant seeking to overturn the decision regarding the valuation of land used for commercial purposes, arguing the established methodology failed to properly account for certain intrinsic qualities of the property that enhanced its market value. The court reasoned that the initial valuation, while generally sound, insufficiently substantiated the exclusion of specific expert appraisals that suggested a higher value due to the land's unique location and development potential, leading to the partial admission of the appeal to remit the matter for a reassessment that properly incorporates all relevant factual evidence pertaining to market valuation.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Land Valuation Appeal Reassessment for Commercial Property: The court reasoned that the initial valuation, while generally sound, insufficiently substantiated the exclusion of specific expert appraisals that suggested a higher value due to the land's unique location and development potential, leading to the partial admission of the appeal to remit the matter for a reassessment that properly incorporates all relevant factual evidence pertaining to market valuation.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
valeur vénale de l'immeuble matière commerciale réévaluation par expert décision partielle reclassement de zone à bâtir promotion immobilière

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article was cited in the dispositive to rule on the costs of the federal proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

A/3954/2007

### [ATAS/1082/2008](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1962035) du 29.09.2008 ( AI ) , PARTIELMNT ADMIS

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2008/0010/ATAS_001082_2008_A_3954_2007.pdf)

* /