Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/1074/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/1074/2004 Généré par l'IA

Jurisdiction Over Arbitration Clause Validity in Construction Contract Dispute

Numéro de cause ATAS/1074/2004
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party challenged the jurisdiction of the tribunal to hear a dispute concerning a construction contract, arguing that the contract's forum selection clause designated a specific local court, which had allegedly refused jurisdiction, thereby rendering the matter not arbitrable. The court reasoned that the dispute centered on the interpretation and validity of the arbitration clause itself, specifically addressing whether the initial filing in the court negated the arbitration agreement, and determined that the language of the agreement clearly mandated arbitration, irrespective of prior, potentially unsuccessful, attempts to litigate in a non-designated forum, thus affirming the tribunal's jurisdiction.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Jurisdiction Over Arbitration Clause Validity in Construction Contract Dispute: The court reasoned that the dispute centered on the interpretation and validity of the arbitration clause itself, specifically addressing whether the initial filing in the court negated the arbitration agreement, and determined that the language of the agreement clearly mandated arbitration, irrespective of prior, potentially unsuccessful, attempts to litigate in a non-designated forum, thus affirming the tribunal's jurisdiction.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
validité de clause compromissoire contrat de construction objet du litige audition des parties compétence en matière de contrats conclus par les consommateurs notion de pouvoir adjudicateur

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Applied to order the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
A/13/2007
Arbitration Clause Validity and Scope Dispute
A/3820/2005
Arbitration Clause Validity Versus Contract Validity Dispute
A/1784/2005
Contract Jurisdiction Clause Validity and Forum Non Conveniens
C/121/2004
Validity and Scope of Arbitration Agreement in Subsequent Contractual Disputes
C/13252/2014
Jurisdiction Clause Validity in Architectural Mandate Dispute

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied to order the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               &'())&'+,', -&(*.+&'+

 -

 -  "-   " " 

'/  01  $  '( 0  '+ 



$ 2222222222 



   0 3$0 0  00 !"!! !!%* #! !$" %!&'() 

           ! "    #$%

   +,)'+  

-*.!%!+ */!  ./$0! &1#!,223!%$! *4

5 6!/.6777 7!**-!  8!+69 777 :4

 *!!66!!!5!*6777 30,2234

!  !(777  &30,223%!%%0#  %6* !0 *,&0,2234

 *! *(777 6*64

  !   !9  ' *%0 ,223 6 $  ! 6  6 (/.5 5! !%4

-!"! ! 4

..%%5!(6*  ! 6!6-"! *"*;

 444444

 " - 5  -  "-   " " 

$

607   8  9   3% (:' ;<

&;   (  777  77  7      6   /. 

*! 6 -*.!   %!+ */!    ./ $-!  0!&1#!,223;

,; *06! !!;

'; !$6* .!;



)  +')'+   3; 5%  6!   $- 6" 5%    6* >   *!  '2 # 9  !5!! 6 6! %% *  *  !0 5* *   7/?!@/5$! A A223     ! B%6!;  *!  6 > 6.*;  %*%! !C : ! !$ B%$ *!! *!0!!6  *!! $*40:B66$6*;7!%*%!!6 ! **% *%**   : 0:  : !+   !0 5* *    6 6   %!9    $-! " * !"0;%*%! %!%D 6"$! #!!!$ *!!$*-"66 $** B6* !*8;&',&2A&2E:;  .55!C  *! C     ! 7 07





6!5% 6*>!5!*B6!!!$-(-55!5* * *60!$6.55



)