Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/1068/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/1068/2007 Généré par l'IA

Contract Interpretation and Breach Regarding Financial Calculation

Numéro de cause ATAS/1068/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute arose from a disagreement over the interpretation of a contract provision relating to the calculation of specific financial terms, where one party alleged a breach due to improper application of the formula stipulated in the agreement. The court reasoned that the language of the controlling contract provision was unambiguous and clearly mandated a particular method for calculating the terms in question, concluding that the opposing party's interpretation and resulting actions constituted a material breach of the contract terms as written.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Contract Interpretation and Breach Regarding Financial Calculation: The court reasoned that the language of the controlling contract provision was unambiguous and clearly mandated a particular method for calculating the terms in question, concluding that the opposing party's interpretation and resulting actions constituted a material breach of the contract terms as written.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
interprétation du contrat dispositions financières mode de calcul accords particuliers valeur litigieuse arbitrage financier

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision was used to order the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
A/1593/2003
Contract Interpretation Regarding Financial Obligation Calculation
A/2014/2005
Contract Interpretation and Breach of Financial Agreement
A/451/2005
Contractual Interpretation of Financial Obligation Calculation
A/809/2005
Contract Breach Dispute Regarding Financial Obligation Interpretation
A/1090/2007
Contractual Interpretation and Breach

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision was used to order the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



           "#$%#"#&&' "(&)$"#&&'



  *+ **+  *  +

,  # ! # -.-  #&&'         !"#$%&'()*+,!-. . )".  !/".   0. 12 3.    .    ,,   / ((     .!" +4#-.$&%5&55 56   

                !   !

   9&769  

* * / 

 - "  56 : &''# /,,     / (( 9     ;9-<  =  >" ?    ;9-<  .= .?/ !.":< . " /...@

     54 :. &''#  . . ? /.   " .* ?   !.  /   )!.  / !." :< /....)  ?/ - !..).  "-@

A "  "." >B" ? /   5$ -.!C &''# - "-  . "-  @

 - -  &' -.!C &''# /   .!  C  " /.   " .* .  ) ? / !.. - !-"!. /..- . 58-.!C&''#D

* * *  

AB .!  A.D %6    >" "   -. *""  .  ; =A-. " " " --.:EA?A) -") C@

..A-<-E ".*".""@

A) A.  " ).C:..EA). + F@

.EC..*  .  "->B"/-<?%''>D



7&8$&7&''#  96769  

  1 / +  *+ **+  *  +

5D  .  " -A.!"58-.!C&''#D

&D ..E. )C:.D

6D + FD

$D  !/ )!. / !.">) . %''>D

%D >!-. EA-).>!.-".G.   "  6' : <  .>. -<  C >" " ;(3HI3>EJJ''$  =-) !.<  . -C>!"!.B.D8& >" " C>" " 5# : &''% ; ,=@  !"!   .  E   !.> . !+ -).-.*. . ! .@ . G.  "  C >" " - ) -.  - ) ".E B  . /.D$& ,D-".G..-<- . )E"!!!+ -) ).G.:.?/)D

 *>><  " .M     KL 2 C( 

->! -".G...>"B-.EA?A>>>" " -*>>



 



7&8$&7&''#