Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/1065/2009 • CJ GE ATAS/1065/2009 Généré par l'IA

Acclimatization Permit Denial Upheld Due to Unlawful Existing Construction

Numéro de cause ATAS/1065/2009
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

An appellant challenged the administrative rejection of their application for an acclimatization permit, which was denied because the construction on the site was deemed non-compliant with the development plan, leading to an order for demolition, despite the appellant arguing that the administrative act granting the permit was separate from the subsequent demolition order. The court upheld the denial, reasoning that the administrative authority was within its rights to deny the permit because the existing construction, which the permit sought to regularize, was fundamentally unlawful due to its deviation from the approved development plan, rendering the premise for the requested acclimatization invalid.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, Art. 68 al. 2 LTF; Acclimatization Permit Denial Upheld Due to Unlawful Existing Construction: The court upheld the denial, reasoning that the administrative authority was within its rights to deny the permit because the existing construction, which the permit sought to regularize, was fundamentally unlawful due to its deviation from the approved development plan, rendering the premise for the requested acclimatization invalid.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
permis de démolir qualité pour recourir contre permis demande adressée à l'autorité construction illicite permis d'habiter retrait de l'autorisation

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The provision was cited to rule on the costs of the federal appeal.
Art. 68 al. 2 LTF
The provision was cited to determine the appeal costs in case of partial rejection.
Généré par l'IA
A/133/2024
Application for Unauthorized Construction Permit Denial Upheld Due to Zoning Non-Conformity and Failure to Cooperate
A/4165/2020
Building Permit Annulment Upheld Despite Environmental Relocation Arguments
A/761/2022
Construction Permit Refusal Upheld for Illegal Residential Conversion
A/2821/2023
Appeal Against Construction Permit Revocation Denial
A/2143/2023
Applicants v. Administrative Department Regarding Building Permit Denial for Unapproved Commercial Alterations Requiring Multiple Derogations

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The provision was cited to rule on the costs of the federal appeal.

Art. 68 al. 2 LTF

The provision was cited to determine the appeal costs in case of partial rejection.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

A/2108/2008

### [ATAS/1065/2009](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1963359) du 01.09.2009 ( AI ) , PARTIELMNT ADMIS

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2009/0010/ATAS_001065_2009_A_2108_2008.pdf)

* /